No.
I don’t believe I’m infallible.
Just not as fallible as the traditions of men edifice of the RC . . . structure etc. . . .
but it’s just an old version of many such structures of men . . . and thereby MORE vulnerable to traditions of men errors.
Vocabulary time . . .
MORE than is DIFFERENT from LESS than.
MORE is different from 0.00.
“A” as MORE fallible than “B” does not mean that “B” is 100% INFALLIBLE.
You must be joking. Now, you are less fallible than the 2000 year mind of the Church...
Is that a vast improvement on your last claim? You still are saying you are right and the entire 2000 year Church is wrong. Based on your "less fallible" nature, no doubt...