Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: kosta50; kawaii; Forest Keeper; annalex; Kolokotronis; Quix; Dr. Eckleburg
No one refers to any saints as living, except +Paul. That is one of those Pauline innovations the Church resolutely rejected but never talks about.

Hmmmm....I had to look this one up. Actually "saints" is used 96 times throughout scripture a third of which is used in the Old Testament.

Luke, in the book of Acts uses the word "saints" as well

as the writer of Hebrews

and, as you pointed out, Revelation. In almost all cases, saints is in reference to believers who are living. In fact, in several cases, scripture refer to saints who have died:

I would suggest that the Church made an error on classifying "saints" as those who are not living.
12,364 posted on 04/11/2007 11:26:18 AM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12332 | View Replies ]


To: HarleyD

Who was it that Luke followed and Learned from?

Hebrews is also generally attributed to St Paul.

The Orthodox do not suspect the saints are actually dead, instead we acknwoeldge that the saints, even those departed from Earth, are alive in heaven, and still pray. (The notion that folks who go to heaven stop praying is crazy).


12,366 posted on 04/11/2007 11:47:33 AM PDT by kawaii (Orthodox Christianity -- Proclaiming the Truth Since 33 A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12364 | View Replies ]

To: HarleyD; kawaii; Forest Keeper; annalex; Kolokotronis; Quix; Dr. Eckleburg
Hmmmm....I had to look this one up. Actually "saints" is used 96 times throughout scripture a third of which is used in the Old Testament

They are not the same words in original languages. The OT (Hebrew) uses the word chaciyd which translates as faithful, kind (hardly a 'saint'). The Hebrew word for 'saint' is qadowsh (holy one).

The OT Greek version (LXX) uses όσιος (hosios) without blame, pious..

the New Testament uses exclusively the word άιγιος (haigios), or most holy

Clearly the Hebrews in the OT do not refer to all the faithful as "saints" (i.e. holy ones), whether in Hebrew or Greek. That is a Pauline innovation which the Church never accepted.

The Lutherans went one step farther and called themselves the divines!. Talk about narcissism.

12,369 posted on 04/11/2007 12:07:05 PM PDT by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12364 | View Replies ]

To: HarleyD; kosta50; kawaii; Forest Keeper; annalex; Kolokotronis; Quix; Dr. Eckleburg
I had to look this one up

Thnak you for doing so; I was thinking of looking for the same scriptures, as clearly Kosta is reachign with hsi assertions.

the Church made an error on classifying "saints" as those who are not living.

Well, on the basis of the scripture alone I have to agree with you, but the Church had to distinguish between cases when sanctification could be ascertained objectively and the rest. The former category has to be people who went to sleep in the Lord, as we believe that it is the totality of one's life and not a single act of faith, that gives us clues into the final justification. We certainly would not want veneration of living people to be the norm.

12,458 posted on 04/12/2007 5:45:07 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12364 | View Replies ]

To: HarleyD; kosta50; kawaii; annalex; Kolokotronis; Quix; Dr. Eckleburg
Actually "saints" is used 96 times throughout scripture a third of which is used in the Old Testament.

Good call. It is absolutely clear that they are referred to as living. I'm not sure of the significance, but I was amazed to see 96 references to the word "saints", and ZERO references to the word "saint".

13,053 posted on 04/19/2007 12:34:46 AM PDT by Forest Keeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12364 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson