Replies

For example, Jerome caved (in his deeds), Luther didn't, but they were of a like mind on the issue of inspiration. There is also the matter that the Jews themselves threw them out well before they were canonized in any sense.

First of all, Luther also caved - he didn't remove James.

Secondly, don't you get it? Your continued defense of the removal of the Deuterocanonicals is based on the Jews - who denied Christ. Is that whom you will side with? How often must I remind you that you are siding with the Pharisees who rejected Christ and the Christians??? In you rush to condemn the Church and anything Catholic, you commit intellectual suicide and don't even realize it...

Regards

Your continued defense of the removal of the Deuterocanonicals is based on the Jews - who denied Christ. Is that whom you will side with?

That's only part of the case. The articles BD posted also showed provable historical errors, AND clear contradictions with other scripture, along with other evidence.

Maybe I should treat the OT Duets the same way my Apostolic friends have. Between this thread and the other one, let's say that 1,000 authoritative references have been posted to me by you all. If 500 have been from scripture I recognize and 497 have been quotes from the Fathers and the like, then MAYBE 3 have been from the OT Duets. I have really noticed that and figure it must mean something.