[Forest Keeper]

Your continued defense of the removal of the Deuterocanonicals is based on the Jews - who denied Christ. Is that whom you will side with?

That's only part of the case. The articles BD posted also showed provable historical errors, AND clear contradictions with other scripture, along with other evidence.

Maybe I should treat the OT Duets the same way my Apostolic friends have. Between this thread and the other one, let's say that 1,000 authoritative references have been posted to me by you all. If 500 have been from scripture I recognize and 497 have been quotes from the Fathers and the like, then MAYBE 3 have been from the OT Duets. I have really noticed that and figure it must mean something.

[Forest Keeper]

"Duets" = "Deuts". Dang spellchecker should have known what I meant. :)

[jo kus]

Maybe I should treat the OT Duets the same way my Apostolic friends have.

Yea, you should. They also thought they were Scripture, because they use them in the same sentence as Isaiah and Jeremiah and so forth when proving a point of view, giving them equal authority. I have given numerous examples of this.

Regards