Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: HarleyD

If you'l recall the New Testament original language is Greek; it's not a translation.

As for your second claim it's plain silly; why do most protestants not follow Corinthians? Because they read their translation which is worded poorly and seems to suggest that 282 of St Paul's words which have been accepted as scripture for almost 2000 yeras are meaningless and do not apply today. It's not simply the doctrine (women refraining from preaching and covering their heads) it's the translation and the 'interpretation' of the reader which is iseparably linked to that translation.

Further we get things like the revised standard edition which, for example, leave off 8 versus at the end of Mark amoung which is the one where Christ says folks must be baptised.

It's a fact that since the 14th century there have been rampant attempts by folks with an axe to grind to translate the Bible into what they'd LIKE it to say in English rather than what the original says.


10,129 posted on 02/12/2007 11:07:14 AM PST by kawaii (Orthodox Christianity -- Proclaiming the Truth Since 33 A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10128 | View Replies ]


To: kawaii
If you'l recall the New Testament original language is Greek; it's not a translation.

Because they read their translation which is worded poorly and seems to suggest that 282 of St Paul's words which have been accepted as scripture for almost 2000 yeras are meaningless and do not apply today.

Further we get things like the revised standard edition which, for example, leave off 8 versus at the end of Mark...It's a fact that since the 14th century there have been rampant attempts by folks with an axe to grind to translate the Bible into what they'd LIKE it to say


10,132 posted on 02/12/2007 11:53:52 AM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10129 | View Replies ]

To: kawaii; HarleyD
"If you'l recall the New Testament original language is Greek; it's not a translation."

That's not entirely correct. Matthew was first written in Hebrew then Aramaic and then translated into Greek. Papias, Irenaeus, Eusebius and Origen all attest to the fact that it was first written in Hebrew and there is a large body of experts who say it was also in Aramaic as they say of the Gospel of Mark and Jude's letter. There is also the different forms of Greek used by Luke, Paul, James and the writer of Hebrew, with the use of different idioms and Hebraisms and Aramaic sayings; all having to be translated according to the scrivener's particular bias.

The Greek was not consistent throughout the original letters and the Old Testament references had to be translated from the Hebrew thought into the Greek language which didn't have words or thought forms to accurately translate the original ideas..
10,166 posted on 02/12/2007 6:25:50 PM PST by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson