[Religion Moderator]

The term "liar" attributes ill motive or evil intent to the other poster - thus it is not tolerable on the Religion Forum. It is "making it personal."

For instance, a false statement was made at post 454 which I corrected at post 456.

To characterize the original statement as a "lie" or the poster as a "liar" would have been inflammatory and since I cannot read his mind, also false.

[Elsie]

Ah....

[King Prout]

The term "liar" attributes ill motive or evil intent to the other poster - thus it is not tolerable on the Religion Forum. It is "making it personal."
For instance, a false statement was made at post 454 which I corrected at post 456.
To characterize the original statement as a "lie" or the poster as a "liar" would have been inflammatory and since I cannot read his mind, also false.

question: when a poster makes (a series of) false statement(s), is corrected by others, repeats the false statement(s), is corrected again and is shown in exquisite detail the depth of the falsity of his posts, and this person continues to post the same false statement(s), does this not constitute ample illustration of either that poster's incurable stupidity or that poster's deliberate mendacity?

and, as an aside - since you brought it up, if neither you nor PH put this thread into the religion forum, exactly who did? I still await an explanation of this ill-considered miraculous event.