To: NewLand
well, by your own strongly worded demand ("Keep this kind of nonsense in the category of 'agenda driven science fiction'"), evidently you *do* have a problem with *whoever* made the decision to relocate this thread into the religion category.
so do I.
but that is neither here nor there.
463 posted on
09/19/2006 8:57:50 PM PDT by
King Prout
(many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
rofl.
eagles' wings and apron-strings, I see.
very well.
467 posted on
09/19/2006 9:12:23 PM PDT by
King Prout
(many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
To: King Prout
evidently you *do* have a problem with *whoever* made the decision to relocate this thread into the religion category. No, I don't.
My "problem" is with the lightweight "thesis" proposed by the author, then duly propped up by the original poster as part of an old, worn out agenda.
My fellow FReepers skillfully disposed of the issue. FR deserves better than this.
539 posted on
09/20/2006 7:03:22 AM PDT by
NewLand
(Always Remember September 11, 2001)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson