You would be wrong. TC54 has already acknowledged today that the late date of Revelation has considerable evidence.
It is clearly the most compelling.
Careful, I don't think I used that phrase. It is certainly not what I believe. All I conceded is that the date of Revelation is not an infallible dogma. Which is all I've ever said at any time.
Perhaps it's just wishful thinking on your part. I still do not believe the late date evidence is as compelling as the early date evidence.
Perhaps but I have no dog in this fight except to say that the author's statement that "God has preserved His people" in reference to the Jews is flat out wrong and directly contradicts 1 Peter 2:9.
Besides, the evidence that the earth is 6 billion years old is equally compelling.