To: xzins; P-Marlowe; Alex Murphy; HarleyD; Dr. Eckleburg; OrthodoxPresbyterian; TomSmedley
You would be wrong. TC54 has already acknowledged today that the late date of Revelation has considerable evidence. Careful, I don't think I used that phrase. It is certainly not what I believe. All I conceded is that the date of Revelation is not an infallible dogma. Which is all I've ever said at any time.
Perhaps it's just wishful thinking on your part. I still do not believe the late date evidence is as compelling as the early date evidence.
89 posted on
09/01/2006 11:27:14 AM PDT by
topcat54
To: topcat54
You opened the door...but I'll be careful.
91 posted on
09/01/2006 11:28:42 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson