1 posted on
08/26/2006 4:55:28 PM PDT by
sionnsar
To: ahadams2; cf_river_rat; fgoodwin; secret garden; MountainMenace; SICSEMPERTYRANNUS; kaibabbob; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder
Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by
sionnsar,
Huber and
newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans:
http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com More Anglican articles
here.
Humor:
The Anglican Blue (by Huber)
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
2 posted on
08/26/2006 4:55:59 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d, N0t Y0urs | EndOfTheWorldDay+4)
To: sionnsar
He said he is convinced that biblical passages forbidding a man to lie with a man as with a woman refer to heterosexual men carrying on erotic affairs with men. The Bible also forbids pigs to fly. Good thing God asks nothing hard of us, isn't it?
4 posted on
08/26/2006 6:32:16 PM PDT by
madprof98
To: sionnsar
He said he is convinced that biblical passages forbidding a man to lie with a man as with a woman refer to heterosexual men carrying on erotic affairs with men.In their "wisdom" they have become fools. (or liars perhaps)
5 posted on
08/26/2006 6:39:16 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(Leftists, the enemy within.)
To: sionnsar
He said he is convinced that biblical passages forbidding a man to lie with a man as with a woman refer to heterosexual men carrying on erotic affairs with men. So, let me get this straight. The good Bishop believes that it is a sin for a heterosexual man to lie with another man, but it is not a sin for a homosexual man to lie with another man??
Maybe I am not following this correctly, but the action here is the same, is it not? It should not matter what a man's (or woman's) sexual orientation is, it is the act itself, and the lust thereof if you will, that is the abomination.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson