To: ahadams2; cf_river_rat; fgoodwin; secret garden; MountainMenace; SICSEMPERTYRANNUS; kaibabbob; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder
Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by
sionnsar,
Huber and
newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans:
http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com More Anglican articles
here.
Humor:
The Anglican Blue (by Huber)
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
2 posted on
08/19/2006 7:39:24 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d, N0t Y0urs | NYT:Jihadi Journal)
To: doc1019
The Bible says in 1Timothy 3:2 that bishops and elders should be a "husband of one wife". Indicates that bishops (preachers, and leaders of Christian churches) and elders of the church should be men.
Agree or disagree with Gods proclamation, it is Gods proclamation and therefore sacrosanct.
3 posted on
08/19/2006 8:01:42 PM PDT by
doc1019
To: sionnsar
I appreciate Canon Heidt's arguments from natural law--he sounds very much like C. S. Lewis in his essay "Priestesses in the Church."
I think he's absolutely right that a priest, as a representative of the real man Jesus, cannot be a woman. Lewis maintained that it may well be possible for a woman to represent the Church to God, but not God to the Church. A big part of a priest's job is to model Christ to His Church...and that cannot be done by a woman.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson