Posted on 08/07/2006 6:18:10 AM PDT by topcat54
David Brog has written Standing with Israel: Why Christians Support the Jewish State. The ten reviews I read on Amazon were quite favorable, and it is being advertised on WorldNetDaily. The fact that the Foreword was written by John Hagee, author of Jerusalem Countdown, From Daniel to Doomsday, Beginning of the End, and Final Dawn over Jerusalem, is a clear indication that the books thesis fits with the modern-day prophetic system known as dispensational premillennialism. I doubt that the book covers what this article reveals.
In my debate with Tommy Ice at American Visions Worldview Super Conference (May 26, 2006), Ice pointed out that one of the unique features of the dispensational system is that near the end of a future, post-rapture, seven-year tribulation period, Israel will be rescued by God. After nearly 2000 years of delayed promises, God will once again come to the rescue of His favored nation. Ice and other dispensationalists imply by this doctrine that they are Israels best friend, and anyone who does not adopt their way of interpreting the Bible is either anti-Semitic (Hal Lindsey) or a methodological naturalist (Tommy Ice).
In the debate, I wanted Tommy to explain how a belief in Israels glorious future results in the slaughter of two-thirds of the Jews living at the time the Great Tribulation nears the end of its seven-year run. I quoted the following dispensational writers to show that there is no glorious future for all Jews who are under siege, to use Tommys words, in the dispensational version of the Great Tribulation.
There are geopolitical implications to the dispensational system that some people have picked up on.
Dispensational theology as it relates to Israel is alarming to some Jewish leaders as well. Rabbi David Saperstein, director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, asks, To what extent will a theological view that calls for Armageddon in the Middle East lead [evangelicals] to support policies that may move in that direction, rather than toward stability and peaceful coexistence?(2) The most probable scenario is that prophetic futurists will sit back and do nothing as they see Israel go up in smoke since the Bible predicts an inevitable holocaust. It is time to recognize that these so-called end-time biblical prophecies have been fulfilled, and Zechariah 13:79 is certainly one of them. Those Jews living in Judea prior to the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 and who fled before the assault on the temple were saved (Matt. 24:1522).Convinced that a nuclear Armageddon is an inevitable event within the divine scheme of things, many evangelical dispensationalists have committed themselves to a course for Israel that, by their own admission, will lead directly to a holocaust indescribably more savage and widespread than any vision of carnage that could have generated in Adolf Hitlers criminal mind.(1)
1. Grace Halsell, Prophecy and Politics: Militant Evangelists on the Road to Nuclear War (Westport, CT: Lawrence Hill & Co., 1986), 195.
2. Quoted in Jeffery L. Sheler, Odd Bedfellows, U.S. News & World Report (August 12, 2002), 35.
Gary DeMar is president of American Vision and the author of more than 20 books. His latest is Myths, Lies, and Half Truths.
Permission to reprint granted by American Vision P.O. Box 220, Powder Springs, GA 30127, 800-628-9460.
Most don't look at it it terms of salvation. Most religious Jews embrace the Kabbalistic concept of "Tikun Olam" which means to repair the world. The ideal way of doing that is by living God's commands given at Sinai (not to say Christians don't). I think its a better concept than to believe the world is doomed hence focusing primarily on preparing for life in a different realm. After all, we are here for a reason. Its my belief correct doctrine cannot be the answer. Its my opinion that "do" is preferable to "believe". Moses apparenty beleived the same thing. Deut 30:
11For this commandment which I command thee this day, it is not hidden from thee, neither is it far off.
12It is not in heaven, that thou shouldest say, Who shall go up for us to heaven, and bring it unto us, that we may hear it, and do it?
13Neither is it beyond the sea, that thou shouldest say, Who shall go over the sea for us, and bring it unto us, that we may hear it, and do it?
14But the word is very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart, that thou mayest do it.
Is there a "Christian Race"? Are Greeks Christian? How about the Irish? Or the Italians, or the Spanish?
Or do Christians of all races know that "by grace they are saved"? Do we claim descent from Japtheth and that saves us? Of course not. Like Abraham, we believe.
If race saves, then the Arabs have as much claim to the Plan of Salvation thru Mohammed as Christians do thru Jesus. They believe that, but Jews and Christians do not.
In a way I believe you're correct but only so far as events go. However, there is a great danger in trying to read into the scriptures things based upon our surroundings. History is littered with people who donned white sheets and stood on hilltops waiting for Christ simply because they thought they had the eschatological answer.
I mean this in the best sort of way, really I do. But the idea of the Jews being "blessed" has no room in Christian theology either from a biblical or a historical perspective. The Bible teaches that Christians have been "grafted" into Judaism. Jews and Gentiles are merged into Christians. We don't exist as a dual group. For over 1900 years this was the teaching of the church.
I mean this kindly but it borders on blasphemy to suggest that Jews hold some esteem with God the Father. This is simply not the case. Paul's heart ached for the Jews just as our hearts should to see them come to know Christ.
God is not in the habit of blessing a group of people who reject His Son. And I bet He knew this when He issued the promises to Abraham 6,000 years ago. He never blessed the Jews in the Old Testament when they rebelled so why should we assume He'll do it now?
As Christians, to "do" as well as "believe" should be our goal as well, and I do believe many quietly go about it, yet many do not. Both of us are called to be the "light" in this dark world, a task and a duty, that we should take very, very seriously. Being a spiritual creature immersed in a material world is most difficult, yet we strive to overcome. I believe with all my heart that the Bible, both the Old Testament and the New, is our guide to overcoming. Thanks, Silverlings
Ding ding ding ding ding ding! And now you know why I'm a postmillennialist - because I expect that God will reward faithful behavior to a greater degree, in time space and history, than Satan can reward unfaithful behavior.
For premillennialism to come to pass, we must believe that God fails to bless the faithful, and fails to punish the wicked, meanwhile the wicked manage reap blessings - to progressively amass increasing power, assets, and responsibilities over time and throughout history - despite the curses prescribed in Genesis, Exodus and Deuteronomy for violating God's commandments. Only the Second Coming itself (or is it the Third Coming, since the Rapture is pretrib?) is powerful enough to intervene and stop humankind from doing what they first tried at the Tower of Babel. Christ's church, of which it's said "the Gates of Hell will not prevail against it", was apparently sent to the wrong front to fight.
In short, premillennialism is the statistical flip-side of postmillennialism - Satan wins all the decisive skirmishes, while the church progressively loses ground until history itself ends.
It's also littered with those who perished because they refused to realize the signs of the times.
With all respect, Harley, you're being a bit inconsistant there. You claim that it is wrong to "to read into the scriptures things based upon our surroundings," but you would claim that it is right to read into the Scriptures things based upon Josephus' record of his surroundings. Candidly, preterists and historicists engage in "newspaper exegesis" every bit as much as Hal Lindsey does.
For over 1900 years this was the teaching of the church.
"Tradition without truth is error grown old." --Tertullian
I mean this kindly but it borders on blasphemy to suggest that Jews hold some esteem with God the Father.
You accuse the Apostle Paul of blasphemy?
For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, "There shall come out of Zion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: For this is My covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins." As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes. For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.It's amazing how fast you Reformists are to slander the Apostles in your haste to deny Israel's promises.
--Romans 11:25-29
God is not in the habit of blessing a group of people who reject His Son.
But He's in the habit of blessing those who present a false image of His Son to said group of people so as to keep them from coming to faith? Anyway, you're still arguing with the Apostle here.
He never blessed the Jews in the Old Testament when they rebelled so why should we assume He'll do it now?
Not precisely true; He always blessed them by retaining a remnant of the faithful and by not destroying them utterly for their sins so that they could come to repentence afterwards.
Tell me, was Israel living righteously when Yeshua came? Or did God bless them with His Son despite a corrupt, non-Aaronic priesthood, blatant hypocrisy among the leadership, and sin? Or did He demand that they be righteous first before He sent the Messiah to redeem them?
That's certainly true however its left up to God as far as whom may take part. There's no obsession about who's in and who's out. There's a mandate here and now which takes considerable focus.
I am correct. Israel is occupying its ancestral land. There is no denying that fact. If anyone has doubts, let them watch this evening's news about war between Hezbollah and Israel. That pretty well settles it.
The biblical issue is determining if: (1) All "Israel" references in prophecy refer to racial Israel, (2) All "Israel" references in prophecy refer to the Church, or (3) There is a split and some refer to racial Israel and some refer to the Church.
Those are your only choices, and how many understand the bible's old and new testament prophetic passages so well that they can say that their way is the only possibility?
No argument from me.
Anyhow, welcome back.
So this Israel that you appear to be enamored of, is it "the light of the world"?
|
I always think it's great when folks put words in my mouth. Do you have others you'd like to add?
That aside, the fact is that Israel is in their ancestral land. We might not like it, but while we're allowed our own personal opinions, we're not allowed our own personal facts.
There it is, Israel -- bold and brassy, bombing the snot out of Hezbollah every chance it gets.
So....which one of the three are you: racial, church, or split option?
Sorry about that. I never even saw it. I think these days deleting a thread erases it from your ping file too.
Did I put words in your mouth? I don't think I did. However, when Ariel Sharon referred to himself, often and openly as "King of the Jews", what, as a Christian, did you think, exactly?
The answer to the question: Is Israel a race or a religion? has always been "both".... There have always existed prostelytes as far back as Ruth. At the time there was no question that Ruth was a religious Jew as opposed to a racial Jew. Yet no Jew or Christian that I know of today questions her Jewishness.
Even so, come Lord Jesus!
Hey, did we ever ask Buggman about his picks at Santa Anita? Of course it was during Shabbat but it was important.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.