It is his bullet so to speak. If she was shot in the lung with lead we would remove it. He shot her in the egg. She has every right to have it removed, IMO. Let's just say I don't buy into rape and incest victims being forced to carry the baby.
Like I told sitetest I will agree to disagree with you on that point.
From what I have read, there is only a very small percentage of women that fall into that category of rape/incest victims who get abortions. It's like one percent. Do you advocate keeping abortion legal for this small percentage when millions of unborn are being killed every year worldwide?
Dear landerwy,
Your bullet analogy doesn't quite work for me. Analogically, the bullet won't combine with something inside the victim to create a brand new, distinct, individual third psrty.
But the sperm does. And the sperm then ceases to exist.
So, following the bullet analogy, how does one remove the now non-existent sperm? As well, when removing the bullet, no other party is harmed. Remove the unborn child (who is partly the product of the sperm/"bullet" - and is all that remains that was connected to the sperm/"bullet") and you've killed her.
Having seen what abortion does to women, even if I could justify this morally, it's apparent that a woman is better off not following up one act of violence on the part of the aggressor with their own act of violence against another innocent victim.
sitetest