Dear landerwy,
Your bullet analogy doesn't quite work for me. Analogically, the bullet won't combine with something inside the victim to create a brand new, distinct, individual third psrty.
But the sperm does. And the sperm then ceases to exist.
So, following the bullet analogy, how does one remove the now non-existent sperm? As well, when removing the bullet, no other party is harmed. Remove the unborn child (who is partly the product of the sperm/"bullet" - and is all that remains that was connected to the sperm/"bullet") and you've killed her.
Having seen what abortion does to women, even if I could justify this morally, it's apparent that a woman is better off not following up one act of violence on the part of the aggressor with their own act of violence against another innocent victim.
sitetest
the sperm doesn't disappear. It is ever so much a weapon as a knife blade or bullett from a gun. I causes internal injury. And physological damage. The dna from the sperm remains until it is cut out or allowed to grow. It is not Gods will that heinious crimes such as this occur. And I am convinced there are times he allows innocent life to be destroyed, like when the Jews ended their 40 years in the wilderness.
And her liberty has been violated. We fight wars to defend our freedom, our liberty. But now in your opinion she has none because of some criminal, who in my opinion has committed a crime worthy of death.
No I don't like innocent being killed anywhere but sometimes it is necessary in war and for some in extreme circumstances like this.
But I will not convince you and you won't me so like I said I'll just agree to disagree! I hope you have a great day in worshipping the Lord!