Indeed, if we were to find fault with either rite from the standpoint of our present query, it would have to be said that
it is actually the Traditional Mass, not the ‘Novus Ordo’, which turns out to be rather too ‘soft on Hell’.
*Oh my....
To: bornacatholic
2 posted on
07/04/2006 6:43:52 AM PDT by
sitetest
(If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
To: bornacatholic
3 posted on
07/04/2006 7:13:38 AM PDT by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: bornacatholic
It's not just the readings, nor is it especially the readings. Remember the old funeral mass:
Dies Iræ, dies illa,
Solvet sæclum in favilla,
Teste David cum Sibylla. Quantus tremor est futurus,
Quando Judex est venturus,
Cuncta stricte discussurus!
4 posted on
07/04/2006 9:24:19 AM PDT by
madprof98
To: bornacatholic
Try reading Abp. Bugnini's "Reform of the Liturgy." In it, he specifically says penitential prayers were removed if they didn't agree with modern sensibilities.
Nice try defending the Neo-Lutheran Mass.
5 posted on
07/04/2006 2:58:00 PM PDT by
pravknight
(Liberalism under the guise of magisterial teaching is still heresy)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson