Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article




1 posted on 06/30/2006 6:50:23 AM PDT by markedmannerf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: markedmannerf

Looks like rocks to me.


2 posted on 06/30/2006 6:53:09 AM PDT by CholeraJoe ("Jack Bauer" is Arabic for "I'm f*cked.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markedmannerf

I think people see what they want to see. Didn't they bring a geologist with them?


3 posted on 06/30/2006 6:54:24 AM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markedmannerf

http://www.anchorstone.com


4 posted on 06/30/2006 6:54:59 AM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (Mr. Franklin, what form of customes did you create in Tiajunna? A beeber, Madam, if you can stune it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markedmannerf
How could wood become petrified in just a few thousand years? Doesn't it take millions of years?

If this is the Ark, then I believe I saw the Andrea Doria sticking out of a hilltop in Kentucky along I-75.

5 posted on 06/30/2006 6:55:09 AM PDT by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markedmannerf

What, no fossilized giraffe skeletons sticking out of a petrified hatch in the roof?


6 posted on 06/30/2006 7:01:46 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (Colossians 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markedmannerf
I find this really interesting. If you showed me the first photo and asked, "What is that a picture of?", I would answer that it's a picture of some old beams.

Looking at the entire body of photos the site has posted though I think a healthy skepticism is a good idea here. I would love to know what a geologist thinks of this.

Thanks for the post.
8 posted on 06/30/2006 7:04:30 AM PDT by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markedmannerf
Wouldn't the most likely disposition of the ark's timbers be that Noah's descendants would have carted them off as ready-made building materials? Isn't that why no one can find the ark, because it no longer exists in situ?

Of course, having thus opined, testing these formations will tell the tale....

13 posted on 06/30/2006 8:04:29 AM PDT by Hebrews 11:6 (Do you REALLY believe that (1) God is, and (2) God is good?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markedmannerf; xzins; P-Marlowe; Revelation 911; Buggman; blue-duncan

Izzit built out of gopher barky barky?


15 posted on 06/30/2006 8:29:28 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (HHD: Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markedmannerf

Wood doesn't petrify when it's exposed on the surface of the earth.

Somebody is engaged in some very wishful thinking.


16 posted on 06/30/2006 8:34:12 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markedmannerf
How many times have you yawned at the claim “Noah’s Ark Has Been Discovered”?

One more.

20 posted on 06/30/2006 9:38:03 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markedmannerf

IF this is it that would be ironic and a wonder in itself. The secrets of the Bible hidden among those who do not believe. I read "The Gold of Exodus" which is what they think is most likely Mt Sinai not in Egypt and not in what was Egypt then the traditional site. It was more likely a true actual exodus into Iraq and a true crossing of the Red Sea at the Gulf of Aquaba. I have a CIA {not kidding} area satellite photo I can't link that shows the region and the shallowness of the Gulf at the point they think the crossing occurred. I'm keeping an open mind but the evidence they showed about MT Sinai IMO was convincing and more true to scripture than Constantine's declared location in the Sinai Peninsula which even at the time of the Exodus was still inside Egypt. The nation of Israel wandering 40 years in Iraq's wilderness? Very realistic.


28 posted on 06/30/2006 11:28:06 AM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson