There are parts of your rant where "Thou shall not bear false witness against thy neighbor" can quite properly be invoked.
When you cannot answer any of his extremely cogent comments you identify his writing as a rant and say he is bearing false witness. Where, I would like to know?
::sigh::
I am trying my best, however futilely, to try to get you tu understand the difficulty Fundamentalist Protestants have with Catholicism/Orthodoxy. All you hear from them are proof texts, so you've come to believe that there can't possibly be any intellectual difficulties with Catholicism's position vis a vis Fundamentalist Protestantism. I'm trying to show you these difficulties. But all you can do is respond with anger, as you almost always do.
I am beginning to suspect you of dishonesty. Is it "false witness" to point out that Biblial inerrancy isn't as important to Catholics as it is conservative Protestants? Is it? That is nothing but plain, obvious truth and everyone knows it. It's no secret that Catholic FReepers do "yeoman service" in de-literalizing and allegorizing the Bible. You could not possibly deny this. Why, if I were to ask you if you believe in Adam and Eve the chances are 90% likely that you'd say "no." And all you can do is hurl a bitter charge against me without even commenting on it?
You could not possibly be unaware of all the anti-literalist Catholic posts on this forum. What is the point with trying to discuss something with a dishonest person?
I'm sure you'd like to believe that the only possible reason to prefer the Protestant to the Catholic position is an extremely low IQ, but this is not the truth however much you'd like to think so.
Why don't you respond to me for a change? How in the world is name-calling alone proving that my points are not valid?