Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Between the Lines
In Catholicism, the Second Vatican Council (1962-65) declared that persons who do not know the Christian gospel but sincerely seek God “can attain to everlasting salvation.” The church decided that requiring explicit Christian faith was too pessimistic, said U.S. theologian Cardinal Avery Dulles, writing in First Things magazine.

The Church has infallibly defined doctrine on salvation and that ain't it. This is:

"There is but one universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved." (Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, 1215.)

"We declare, say, define, and pronounce that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff." (Pope Boniface VIII, the Bull Unam Sanctam, 1302.)

"The most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics, can have a share in life eternal; but that they will go into the eternal fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this ecclesiastical body that only those remaining within this unity can profit by the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, their almsgivings, their other works of Christian piety and the duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved, unless he remain within the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church." (Pope Eugene IV, the Bull Cantate Domino, 1441.)

6 posted on 06/21/2006 8:30:07 AM PDT by murphE (These are days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed but his own. --G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: murphE

You are correct in one sense, but I think you're wrong in another.

Salvation is only through the Catholic Church, however, you are discounting the power of God to provide the dying soul with enough enlightenment at the moment of death to choose or reject the Church. It's not defined, but certainly a theological possibility, since it does not nullify the words of Pope Boniface that salvation comes through the Catholic Church.

St. Dismas seems to be a type of this grace offered at time of death...

What are your thoughts?


9 posted on 06/21/2006 9:00:01 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: murphE

What ever happened to good old biblical truths....

John 14:6 I am the way the truth and the life and no man comes to the father but by me.

Romans 10:9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved

I'd say it's pretty simple and easy to understand that. Notice there were no references to the Pope or to people who just really love God. I don't know about you but I'll stick with the Bible, thank you very much.


11 posted on 06/21/2006 9:25:45 AM PDT by Markdb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: murphE; Between the Lines; Gamecock; Dr. Eckleburg
"We declare, say, define, and pronounce that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff." (Pope Boniface VIII, the Bull Unam Sanctam, 1302.)

If anyone needs a date for the apostacy of the Roman Church I think 1302 AD would be a good place to start.

Subject to the Roman Pontiff? Not bloody likely.We have no king but Christ!

Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved. (Acts 4:12 KJV)

12 posted on 06/21/2006 9:27:08 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (((172 * 3.141592653589793238462) / 180) * 10 = 30.0196631)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: murphE
This is what Russell is referring to:

I am not saying he is right or wrong and I have heard Catholics argue it both ways. Personally, I think this is an argument best left to be hammered out among the Catholics.

13 posted on 06/21/2006 9:27:17 AM PDT by Between the Lines (Be careful how you live your life, it may be the only gospel anyone reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: murphE

So I guess we Prots are really not 'separated brethren' after all.


39 posted on 06/21/2006 2:15:16 PM PDT by Binghamton_native
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: murphE

Thanks for posting that clairification.
I am most gratified that the RCC uses no scripture to back up these edicts. Because there is non.


81 posted on 06/22/2006 10:42:32 AM PDT by Rhadaghast (Yeshua haMashiach hu Adonai Tsidkenu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson