Skip to comments.
Communion Denied to Activists: Gay Rights Supporters Wear Rainbow Sashes to Minn. Mass
Washington Post ^
| 6/5/2006
| Alan Cooperman
Posted on 06/05/2006 9:11:53 AM PDT by Pyro7480
More than 50 gay rights activists wearing rainbow-colored sashes were denied Holy Communion at a Pentecost service yesterday at the Roman Catholic Cathedral in St. Paul, Minn., parishioners and church officials said.
In an act that some witnesses called a "sacrilege" and others called a sign of "solidarity," a man who was not wearing a sash received a Communion wafer from a priest, broke it into pieces and handed it to some of the sash wearers, who consumed it on the spot.
Ushers threatened to call the police, and a church employee burst into tears when the unidentified man re-distributed the consecrated wafer, which Catholics consider the body of Christ. But the Mass was not interrupted, and the incident ended peacefully, said Dennis McGrath, a spokesman for the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis....
...Last year, Cardinal Francis Arinze, head of the Vatican department in charge of worship, wrote a letter to Archbishop Harry J. Flynn of St. Paul, stating that the rainbow sash is a sign of protest against the church's teachings on sexuality and that the Mass is not an appropriate forum for protests....
...None were reported yesterday in the Archdiocese of Washington, which has a policy of denying Communion to anyone wearing a visible sign of protest.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; General Discusssion; Ministry/Outreach; Moral Issues; Prayer; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: catholic; communion; eucharist; gay; homosexual; homosexualagenda; minnesota; rainbowsash; sacrament
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
In an act that some witnesses called a "sacrilege" and others called a sign of "solidarity," a man who was not wearing a sash received a Communion wafer from a priest, broke it into pieces and handed it to some of the sash wearers, who consumed it on the spot.Either train the EME's to better monitor the communicants or stop giving communion in the hand!!!!
(Personally, I prefer the second option.)
1
posted on
06/05/2006 9:12:00 AM PDT
by
Pyro7480
To: Siobhan; Canticle_of_Deborah; broadsword; NYer; Salvation; sandyeggo; american colleen; ...
Catholic ping and sacrilege alert!!
2
posted on
06/05/2006 9:13:06 AM PDT
by
Pyro7480
(What do leftists, Islamists, & Jack Chick and his ilk have in common? Hatred of the Catholic Church)
To: Pyro7480
Either train the EME's to better monitor the communicants or stop giving communion in the hand!!!! Do that and you'd have them passing the wafers mouth to mouth. Escort them from the church and swear out a legal complaint, violation of the 1st Amendment.
3
posted on
06/05/2006 9:16:18 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll. 17,400+ snide replies and counting!)
To: Pyro7480
Either train the EME's to better monitor the communicants or stop giving communion in the hand!!!! From the article:
a man who was not wearing a sash received a Communion wafer from a priest...
4
posted on
06/05/2006 9:25:06 AM PDT
by
ELS
(Vivat Benedictus XVI!)
To: Pyro7480
1 Corinthians 11:
23For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, that the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread:
24And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.
25After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, this cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.
26For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come.
27Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.
28But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.
29For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.
Uhhhhh ... anyone who treats the Blessed Sacrament as a political football would seem not to be 'discerning the Lord's body' ... Pray for them, that they may repent. Before it's too late.
5
posted on
06/05/2006 9:30:53 AM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Pyro7480
And the Washington Post, for some reason, 'considers' (using the journalese jargon) this item to be worthy of inclusion in their news coverage.
Well, there is conflict. Journalists always love that.
6
posted on
06/05/2006 9:32:31 AM PDT
by
siunevada
(If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
To: Pyro7480
Those so disposed can always resort to some subterfuge to obtain the Blessed Sacrament, even if it means breaking into a Church and prising open the tabernacle door, but this voids the whole point of the Rainbow Sash movement.
The incident with the gentleman breaking the Blessed Sacrament and illicitly distributing it, actually underlines that the Church was victorious in this particular skirmish and not the Sashers. The whole point of wearing the Rainbow Sash is to publicly identify yourself as homosexual and for the priest to then give you Communion, thereby endorsing your public display of contempt for Catholic teaching and giving impetus for yet more public displays of disobedience.
The fact that Communion was refused and a non-sash wearer had to sneak it away, simply demonstrates that deception and trickery is the only way the Rainbow Sashers will achieve access to the Blessed Sacrament, and this will never do for this crowd. They don't want the Blessed Sacrament per se. They want public acknowledgement of the rectitude of their cause and the Blessed Sacrament is simply the tool to do this. A means to an end, if you like.
If not wearing the sash is the only way for them to obtain Communion then they are back to square one.
To: marshmallow
The fact that Communion was refused and a non-sash wearer had to sneak it away, simply demonstrates that deception and trickery is the only way the Rainbow Sashers will achieve access to the Blessed Sacrament, and this will never do for this crowd. They don't want the Blessed Sacrament per se. They want public acknowledgement of the rectitude of their cause and the Blessed Sacrament is simply the tool to do this. A means to an end, if you like. If not wearing the sash is the only way for them to obtain Communion then they are back to square one.
*************
Excellent analysis.
8
posted on
06/05/2006 10:13:12 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: ELS
Ah, you paid attention to the details better than I did. ;-) Then the priest should have paid better attention. Or they can follow my suggestion. ;-)
9
posted on
06/05/2006 10:42:13 AM PDT
by
Pyro7480
(What do leftists, Islamists, & Jack Chick and his ilk have in common? Hatred of the Catholic Church)
To: Pyro7480
Beginning in 1997 in England, some Catholics have worn the sashes over their left shoulder to Mass each year on Pentecost, the day on which the New Testament says the Holy Spirit descended on Jesus's disciples. Because the holiday is a celebration of God's gifts, "we think it is an appropriate time to celebrate the gift of our sexuality," said Brian McNeill, a rainbow-sash organizer in Minneapolis.
10
posted on
06/05/2006 10:48:39 AM PDT
by
markomalley
(Vivat Iesus!)
To: Pyro7480; american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; ...
Either train the EME's to better monitor the communicants or stop giving communion in the hand!!!! Both! And switch to communion by intinction. That should cure many ills that afflict the Latin Church.
11
posted on
06/05/2006 12:04:30 PM PDT
by
NYer
(Discover the beauty of the Eastern Catholic Churches - freepmail me for more information.)
To: Pyro7480
I wonder what would happen if these freaks tried this in a mosque.
12
posted on
06/05/2006 12:05:43 PM PDT
by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
To: NYer
Some months ago, certain parties in my Parish requested that our Pastor begin distributing Holy Communion under both species, on a regular basis. I'm quite certain that they were hoping for an army of Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion wielding chalices. What they got instead, was exactly what they asked for. Our Pastor obtained a device similar to this:

and commenced to distributing Holy Communion by intinction at every Mass.
13
posted on
06/05/2006 12:11:53 PM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: markomalley
14
posted on
06/05/2006 12:19:33 PM PDT
by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN, 3rd Bn. 5th Marines, RVN 1969. - St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle!)
To: ArrogantBustard
I want one of those for our church!!!
15
posted on
06/05/2006 12:24:25 PM PDT
by
samiam1972
(Live simply so that others may simply live!)
To: samiam1972
Which?
A ciborium-chalice can be had in exchange for cash and/or other valuable considerations, from any number of church supply merchants.
Our Pastor is one-of-a-kind. You'll have to ask Bishop Loverde for him ... and I'll thank you to leave him where he is.
16
posted on
06/05/2006 12:28:14 PM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: marshmallow
Excellent analysis. Though I am not a Catholic, I believe receiving the Blessed Sacrament or communion is a two-party procedure. It must be blessed by the proper authority and it must be received by one who is worthy or striving with all their hearts to be worthy of such a blessing. If the receiver deliberately receives the Sacrament unworthily, I don't believe it would be blessed to them. Indeed, I believe they are taking condemnation to their own souls to profane the Sacrament. In my faith, if one partakes of the Sacrament or makes a covenant with the Lord without an intent to live up to that covenant, it will be worse for them than if they hadn't entered the covenant in the first place.
17
posted on
06/05/2006 12:28:39 PM PDT
by
caseinpoint
(Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
To: Pyro7480
18
posted on
06/05/2006 12:42:50 PM PDT
by
TradicalRC
("...this present Constitution, which will be valid henceforth, now, and forever..."-Pope St. Pius V)
To: TradicalRC; Pyro7480; All
This is exactly what Poor Father Bob Altier was fighting against for years in the "Archdiocese of Minneapolis".
Let us pray for all Holy and Faithful Priests.
19
posted on
06/05/2006 1:43:08 PM PDT
by
warriorforourlady
(I Love Pope Benedict, The XVI. Our Lady, Help of Christians protect him and guide him.)
To: Pyro7480
The solidarity is with Christ... not the world. This is anti-christ.
20
posted on
06/05/2006 1:55:01 PM PDT
by
AliVeritas
("I see dead people...and illegal immigrants...voting in the next election")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson