FWIW you did not request that a full thread be posted, you only requested that full court point you to "something that expounds on the heresy of MacArthur." A link on that thread would have been sufficient. She was not asked to post a thread, but it appears that she gleefully did so.
I would request that she respond to MacArthur's succinct response to this attack on his ministry.
In post 52, where is the heresy?
True, but I was hoping that a full thread would come of it. Wisely, Full Court opened a new thread rather than allow her John Rice homage thread to be sidetracked further. You and I, for example, have posted threads for similar reasons on many an occasion. Why find fault with her for having done the same?
A link on that thread would have been sufficient.
Possibly, but it would have been insufficient for my purposes. I, for one, am glad we have a thread to hash out the issue and still remain "on topic", aren't you?
She was not asked to post a thread, but it appears that she gleefully did so.
I wouldn't go ascribing hidden motives or emotions to her actions. I would urge others to avoid doing so, as well.
I would request that she respond to MacArthur's succinct response to this attack on his ministry.
I would - and do - encourage her to read it and consider it as well. Whether she responds to you or not is quite another matter.
Excuse me, do you have some kind of a personal axe to grind against me? If you do, please take it private.
Since when is it your job to moderate this forum or attack other posters for what they post, whether it was by request of someone else or not?
Who are you to tell people what is sufficient?
I didn't post a link on that thread because it wasn't about that.
But since when does permission have to go by you as to what gets posted?