True, but I was hoping that a full thread would come of it. Wisely, Full Court opened a new thread rather than allow her John Rice homage thread to be sidetracked further. You and I, for example, have posted threads for similar reasons on many an occasion. Why find fault with her for having done the same?
A link on that thread would have been sufficient.
Possibly, but it would have been insufficient for my purposes. I, for one, am glad we have a thread to hash out the issue and still remain "on topic", aren't you?
She was not asked to post a thread, but it appears that she gleefully did so.
I wouldn't go ascribing hidden motives or emotions to her actions. I would urge others to avoid doing so, as well.
I would request that she respond to MacArthur's succinct response to this attack on his ministry.
I would - and do - encourage her to read it and consider it as well. Whether she responds to you or not is quite another matter.
I would not deign to say that they are "hidden". She posted the thread and appears to believe all the propaganda contained in it. She posted additional information and apparently stands behind her allegation that MacArthur is a rank heretic on the issue of the meaning of the Blood of Christ.
Obviously what MacArthur teaches on this subject (really teaches) is not protestant heresy. It could be considered heretical from a Catholic standpoint, but certainly not from any mainstream protestant denomination that I am aware of.
Again, I "gleefully" await her response to post 52.