To: xzins
Ah.
Well, then, it's *certain* that the KJV had the poorest textual basis of any major English-language translation within the last 400 years.
How's that?
275 posted on
05/25/2006 2:43:21 PM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
You are not very good at "setting the FACTS aside" are you?
:>)
276 posted on
05/25/2006 2:50:41 PM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
To: BibChr
277 posted on
05/25/2006 2:51:17 PM PDT by
Gamecock
("False ideas are the greatest obstacles to the reception of the gospel." Machen predicting Osteen)
To: BibChr
Well, then, it's *certain* that the KJV had the poorest textual basis of any major English-language translation within the last 400 years. Totally incorrect.
281 posted on
05/25/2006 3:48:18 PM PDT by
Full Court
(¶Let no man deceive you by any means)
To: BibChr; xzins
"Well, then, it's *certain* that the KJV had the poorest textual basis of any major English-language translation within the last 400 years."
Yah, but it has good rhythm and you can dance to it. Did you ever try to dance to "The Message"?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson