To: cva66snipe
The reason I said that was that there are a few things on her site that kinda point towards a Calvinist leaning. Also, the conference I was mentioning are purely Calvinist, not an ecumenical gathering.
Calvinists are considered Evangelicals, from the historic sense of the word anyway.
Now, I haven't proven anything one way or the other. She does seem to hide her exact stand from Google. ;-)
77 posted on
04/29/2006 12:19:16 PM PDT by
Gamecock
(Never confuse your Justification with your Sanctification)
To: Gamecock
The reason I said that was that there are a few things on her site that kinda point towards a Calvinist leaning. Also, the conference I was mentioning are purely Calvinist, not an ecumenical gathering. Calvinists are considered Evangelicals, from the historic sense of the word anyway. Now, I haven't proven anything one way or the other. She does seem to hide her exact stand from Google. ;-) Thanks I had to do a some looking on Calvinism. I actually never read the description. I have no conflict with it and pretty well go along with the basic concepts myself for the most part. From what I remember reading from her books it's a good description of her beliefs. But she would minister to any Christian belief just the same a Roman Catholics will to Protestants. {I've seen ample examples of that also and me and my wife hold some Nuns dear to our heart}.
I've seen her in person and she doesn't try to lead anyone to abandon their church to another {a big plus in my book meaning be where GOD has placed you}.
79 posted on
04/29/2006 12:51:37 PM PDT by
cva66snipe
(If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson