Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Gerish
Don't misquote scripture to me. Genesis 38 is about the sin on Onan and his sin was in not following the Jewish law and taking care of his brothers wife. The spilling of the seed was not the issue, it was removing his brother's line from inheritance.

The is no biblical injunction against contraception. It's a church-made law by a (supposedly) celibate priesthood. That was my original point and it is still my point.

66 posted on 04/21/2006 2:26:01 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: muir_redwoods
Wow, only asked you to read it. You don't have to get so testy about it.

Your point is without merit.

72 posted on 04/21/2006 6:22:21 PM PDT by Gerish (Choose God, he has already chosen you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: muir_redwoods
The is no biblical injunction against contraception.

Just like the prohibitions against polygamy, slavery, and abortion, the ban against contraception is based primarily upon reason and natural law.

It's a church-made law by a (supposedly) celibate priesthood.

Historically, opposition to contraception wasn't just a Catholic phenomena. Every mainstream protestant denomination prohibited contraception until 1930 when the Anglicans decreed it to be morally permissible in only the most dire circumstances. Most protestant denominations continued their prohibitions well into the 1950's and 1960's.

74 posted on 04/21/2006 9:28:12 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson