Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Easter as a Meaingful Holiday Lays a Colored Egg?
Biblestudy.org ^ | Unknown | Barbara Fenney

Posted on 04/14/2006 6:32:26 PM PDT by DouglasKC

Easter as a meaningful holiday lays a colored egg?

I have been interested in ancient Greek, Roman and Egyptian mythology since early teenage. The problem was that the stories became repetitive; each culture had its own versions of the basic legends. No matter into which part of the world I extended my studies, the underlying stories remained the same.

It was only when I came into contact with the true God that I realized these legends all came from a single counterfeit religion originating in ancient Mesopotamia.

In this article I do not intend to cover the Easter controversy, concerning the change from Passover to Easter. This is well documented in encyclopedias, church histories and Sabbatarian literature. I will, however, attempt to explain where some of the current traditions have come from.

The legend

Easter is an ancient festival, involving the death and resurrection of the husband or lover of the Great Earth Mother goddess.

Before I explain the details, it might be useful to list some of the equivalent gods and goddesses involved, since every country and often each city-state within that country had its own form of the same divinities, with local variations.

In most cases the husband is also the son or half-brother of the goddess.

  • Assyria: Semiramis and Ninus.
  • Babylon: Ishtar and Tammuz.
  • Egypt: Isis and Osiris
  • Syria: Astarte and Bel or Baal (Marduk) (later Venus Urania and Adonis).
  • Greece: Aphrodite and Adonis.
  • Rome: Kybele and Attis (or Venus and Adonis).

The actual legend is a bit muddled depending on which version you choose but basically goes like this Egyptian one:

The goddess Isis was married to her brother Osiris. The latter was killed by Set, who sent pieces of his body all over the land of Egypt.

Isis set out on a journey to recover the pieces. Having found them, she spent a night and day casting spells to bring Osiris back to life.

In spite of her great powers, she only partially succeeded but was allowed one last night with her husband, during which she conceived her son Horus.

The following morning at dawn Osiris rose to take his place in the heavens alongside his father, the sun god Ra. Having thus received eternal life, he became ruler of the underworld, judging the dead.

What might appear at first glance a simple and noble love story turns out to be anything but that on closer examination. Based on fact, the original so-called goddess, Semiramis, a woman of dubious parentage but great beauty, became queen of Assyria by marrying King Ninus (one of several men she married).

Later she was accused of being involved with his death.

His resurrection into the heavens was an ideal explanation for the disappearance of his body. Her motives seem to have been purely political, to gain control of the kingdom.

To placate her husband's supporters she declared him to be a god and instituted his worship. However, as the supposed god's wife and claiming celestial parentage herself, she soon became the center of worship, reducing the status of Ninus.

Her lovers, it is claimed, were buried alive all over western Asia, yet she managed to retain her role as a mother goddess.

Ishtar (another supposed incarnation of Semiramis) tried to seduce her own son, Gilgamesh, again to retain power. The picture is really one of seduction, incest and murder.

The time of year

The son of Isis, Horus was claimed to have been born Dec. 25. Forty weeks back from that (an average length of pregnancy) brings us to March 21, the vernal or spring equinox.

It is around this date that the ancient celebrations of the death and resurrection of the pagan gods were claimed to have taken place. It is also now used for the dating of Easter.

Yet God makes no mention of the equinox in relation to the timing of Passover, only of the new moon and the beginning of the spring harvest. Neither can Easter claim to be the time of Christ's conception, His birth coming in the autumn (3312 years before His death in the spring).

Duration of the festival

The length of the festival varied greatly from five days in Rome to 11 in Mesopotamia and included the ancients' New Year's festivals. Some involved a week of fasting and purification before the festival proper began.

As mentioned, the actual rites of Isis lasted one day and two nights. In Byblos the death of Adonis was mourned for two days by Venus Urania before he was resurrected and ascended into heaven, accompanied by great joy. Kybele mourned for Attis for two days before finding him and celebrating throughout the third day.

Christ's only sign of his Messiahship was that He would be in the earth (that is, buried) for three days and three nights (Matthew 12:40). As He stated that there are 12 hours in a day, then night comes (John 11:9-10), so there were 12 hours in a night, giving 24 hours in a day.

Therefore three days and three nights equals 72 hours. This clearly distinguishes Him from any of the other so-called gods of the time. The timing of the resuscitation and resurrection of Osiris exactly mirrors modern-day Easter celebrations.

Easter

The name Easter is the modern form of the Anglo-Saxon Earth Mother goddess Eostre (pronounced eestra.) Her festival was celebrated on or near the vernal (spring ) equinox

I haven't found any proof, but I suspect there is a connection between this name and the word oestrus, from which we get estrogen, the female sex hormone.

The name Eostre appears to be a corruption of Astarte, the mother goddess of the ancient Assyrians, also known as Ishtar. The worship of Astarte and her male counterpart Bel (or Baal) was introduced into Britain by the Druids. One of her titles was Frau or Lady. The date of her festival was March 25, which in some lands still bears the name Lady Day.

The word Easter appears only once in some versions of the Bible but is a mistranslation of the Greek word for Passover.

Lent and Easter eggs

Still associated with Easter and the Easter season is Lent. In Babylon Tammuz, husband of Ishtar, was killed by a wild boar, and 40 days of weeping and fasting was ordained for each of the years of his life.

His wife, Ishtar, visited the underworld and by her grief claimed to have been able to revive him. Often the fast included going without meat, poultry and dairy products, as well as eggs.

The custom of giving something up for Lent remains. Sometimes it is claimed that Lent represents Christ's 40 days of fasting before His ministry began. However, since He began His ministry around age 30 and it lasted 3 1/2 years, His fast must have taken place in the autumn. There is no indication in Scripture of any similar fast before His death.

Eggs are a long-standing symbol of creation, fertility, renewed life and resurrection. They have been used at spring festivals since ancient Egypt and Persia, when eating colored eggs was part of their rituals.

The Syrian goddess Astarte was believed to have been hatched from a huge egg that fell into the Euphrates.

Eggs were considered sacred to her and were not eaten for the period of mourning-which corresponds with Lent-for her husband, Bel. They were all eaten up before this period on what we now call Pancake Day or Shrove Tuesday (Mardi Gras) and did not appear again until the joyous celebrations of his resurrection, when they appeared in a riot of colors (the Persians dyed theirs red) and became the object of various games. That they should now be made of chocolate is, I suspect, a marketing ploy!

Hot-cross buns

Hot-cross buns are eaten throughout the spring season, but in ancient Babylon the Chaldeans used to offer them to the queen of heaven (Ishtar) on the day now known as Good Friday.

Similar wheat cakes, marked with a cross, were offered to or eaten in honor of Apollo, Diana, Hecate and the moon (the latter also being Diana's symbol).

The cross represents the four seasons, or the four phases of the moon, and are on the sacrificial bread of the lunar goddesses of many cultures. They are found from Egypt to the Aztecs of Mexico. A circle with a cross (the female symbol) was often set up on top of a pillar (representing the male)-the whole representing union or fertility. It is also interesting that the biological symbol for female remains a circle with a cross beneath.

In Jeremiah 7:18; 44:19, 25, the baking and offering of these cakes to the queen of heaven (Ishtar or Astarte) are mentioned as being part of the apostasy of the people of Judah.

Rabbits and hares

A lesser custom, at least in the United Kingdom, is the idea of the Easter Bunny. Rabbits and hares, prolific breeders, have been a symbol of fertility since antiquity. In Teutonic myth it was a hare that supposedly laid the Easter egg. Hares were the sacrificial victims of the goddess Eostre.

Sunrise services

Sunrise services are a tradition in parts of Europe and America, but not in the United Kingdom as a whole. In the North of Scotland it was supposed that the sun would dance on Easter morn for joy that the savior was risen.

The question is, Which savior? As I stated earlier, Christ was to be in the earth three days and three nights. Since He was put in the earth (buried) on a Wednesday at sunset (as a careful reading of a correct translation of Mark 12:1, Luke 23:56 and Matthew 28:1 reveals), He must have been resurrected three days and three nights later at sunset on the end of the weekly Sabbath, at the same time the wave-sheaf was being cut (Leviticus 23:10-11).

This sheaf would be offered to God the following morning. When the women arrived at Christ's tomb towards dawn on Sunday, He was already risen (Mark 16:2-6), but when he met Mary Magdalene a little later in the garden (presumably after sunrise) He had still not ascended to His Father (John 20:17).

Sun worship was one of the earliest religions. In ancient Babylonia the sun was personified as Tammuz, the returning lover of Ishtar. It was at dawn that the Egyptian Osiris rose to join the sun god in the sky. Even today in Britain Druids hold sunrise services on the summer solstice.

Sunrise has long been the traditional time for sun worship, and Ezekiel 8:16 describes such a service. As if to clarify the season, verse 14 tells us that the women were weeping for Tammuz.

We know therefore that these things occurred at the time of the death and resurrection of Tammuz; that is, at what we now call Easter.

Aphrodite in Scripture?

There is a somewhat oblique reference to Earth Mother cults in the New Testament. This is found in 2 Corinthians 6:15, where Paul asks: What agreement has Christ with Belial?

Vine's Expository New Testament gives Belial in this context as being the cult of Aphrodite. Aphrodite was the Greek equivalent of the Syrian Astarte, renowned for being promiscuous herself and the patron of prostitutes.

In Deuteronomy 12:30-32 God warns His followers not to pollute His worship with customs used to worship pagan gods.

This is wholly understandable when it is realized that most pagan celebrations have strong sexual connotations and look to the mother goddess (queen of heaven) as the supreme deity.

Easter specifically also seems to celebrate political corruption, murder and incest.

With this in mind, surely Christians should be careful to avoid being drawn into keeping customs that God has not sanctioned.

Apart from anything else, such customs may take our minds away from the realization of our need for the death and resurrection of Christ and for our reconciliation with God the Father.

Bibliography

  • Classic Ancient Mythology, Patrick and Croft.
  • The Year of the Goddess, Durdin-Robertson.
  • The Silver Bough, Vol. 2, McNeill.
  • The Aquarian Dictionary of Festivals, Cooper.
  • Myth and Mystery, Jack Finnegan.
  • Myths of Assyria and Babylonia, Mackenzie.
  • Myths of Mesopotamia, Dalley.
  • Vine's Expository New Testament.

Written by: Barbara Fenney



TOPICS: General Discusssion; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: easter; eastereggs; eggs; mythology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: DouglasKC

Yes, Jesus was a jew and his earliest disciples were jews.

So, you gonna be a jew too?

Or are you simply lost in the time warp?


41 posted on 04/15/2006 12:56:52 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Yes, Jesus was a jew and his earliest disciples were jews.
So, you gonna be a jew too?
Or are you simply lost in the time warp?

Actually Jesus and his followers made a significant break with the Jewish religion of the time. Like Christianity today, Judaism had come to rely more upon it's own traditions rather than scripture:

Mar 7:9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.

There are many more examples. The Jewish hierarchy of the day rejected Christ and persecuted his followers. Paul says:

1Co 15:9 For I am the least of the apostles, that am not meet to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God

Gal 1:13 For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in the Jews' religion, how that beyond measure I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it

Today's Jews are descendent's of those Jews who persecuted the church of God.

Observing God's holy days has nothing to do with being Jewish.

42 posted on 04/15/2006 1:03:41 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

Ah.. A member of the Time Warp Church.

What's the name of the group you follow and who started it?


43 posted on 04/15/2006 1:10:13 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Ah.. A member of the Time Warp Church.

If you mean that I follow scripture rather than tradition then I plead guilty...gladly.


What's the name of the group you follow and who started it?

I follow Jesus Christ. The group is the body of Christ, or the church of God as it's called in scripture. I fellowship with and attend services with United Church of God

. It was formed as a corporate entity in 1995 and was started by a large group of ministers who were formerly associated with the World Wide Church of God. They left when the WWCG began to teach non-scriptural doctrines, such as the violation of the 4th commandment.

How about you? What's the name of the group you follow and who started it?

44 posted on 04/15/2006 1:17:56 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

I'm quite familiar with WWCG. I live not far from what used to be their college campus. And a close friend of mine went through the break-up and fragmentation of the church. Armstrong basically put his own spin on the old debate of how jewish should Christianty be? It's an attractive formulation.

You realize, no, likely you don't, that the debate on how "jewish" christianity should be was a major one in the decades after Christ's crucifixion.

It was thought, or hoped, by many apostles that Judaism would become Judaism with Christ. However, the bulk of jews did not follow, and even threw out the Christian ministers. Now what were they to be?

So, jewish or gentile, how much or how little was a decision and a turning point for Christianity. It could no longer be Judaism with Christ as it was when He was alive.

Orthodoxy can be seen as answering this question - among others including the nature of Christ in monotheism.

Some wish to go back to that time, when Christ was a jew and Christians were observant jews who believed in Christ.

But you cannot go back, cannot freeze time and pretend the decision doesn't exist. Hence I call them "The Church of the Time Warp."

To answer your question: The group I follow is called the Catholic Church and it was started by Jesus of Nazareth.


45 posted on 04/15/2006 1:44:58 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

"Satan has the power to foresee earthly events and foresaw biblical events."

Where in the Bible did you get this information from? Only God can see the future. Satan can only guess. That's why God says you will know a true prophet of God from a false prophet is that EVERY prophecy he makes comes true, but a false prophet (from Satan) will only have only a very few come true because he is only guessing.


46 posted on 04/15/2006 1:55:23 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
You realize, no, likely you don't, that the debate on how "jewish" christianity should be was a major one in the decades after Christ's crucifixion.

Oh yes, I'm pretty familiar with the reasoning behind why these decisions were made. I don't agree with them.

It was thought, or hoped, by many apostles that Judaism would become Judaism with Christ. However, the bulk of jews did not follow, and even threw out the Christian ministers. Now what were they to be?

I'm afraid that you're under the impression that I'm advocating Judaism. I think you may even be under the impression that Judaism today adheres to scripture more than tradition.

Orthodoxy can be seen as answering this question - among others including the nature of Christ in monotheism.

Unfortunately orthodoxy went to far.

Some wish to go back to that time, when Christ was a jew and Christians were observant jews who believed in Christ. But you cannot go back, cannot freeze time and pretend the decision doesn't exist. Hence I call them "The Church of the Time Warp."

Nonsense. Rome doesn't have a monopoly on God or how God is worshipped. Scripture shows how God wants to be worshipped.

To answer your question: The group I follow is called the Catholic Church and it was started by Jesus of Nazareth.

My usual practice is not to engage in debate with those who claim membership in the Catholic church. We have no common ground. I believe that God speaks to his people through scripture. My understanding is that tradition can supercede scripture in the Catholic church. I know it has on the sabbath issue. In other words tradition plays as much a part in what you believe as scripture does. Tradition is great, but when it disagrees with scripture I'm sticking with scripture.

47 posted on 04/15/2006 6:26:06 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
"Satan has the power to foresee earthly events and foresaw biblical events."
Where in the Bible did you get this information from? Only God can see the future. Satan can only guess. That's why God says you will know a true prophet of God from a false prophet is that EVERY prophecy he makes comes true, but a false prophet (from Satan) will only have only a very few come true because he is only guessing.

Satan tempted Jesus in the wilderness because he knew what his plan was. If not, there as no reason to tempt him.

Another interesting case in the bible was this encounter with demons:

Mat 8:28 And when he was come to the other side into the country of the Gergesenes, there met him two possessed with devils, coming out of the tombs, exceeding fierce, so that no man might pass by that way.
Mat 8:29 And, behold, they cried out, saying, What have we to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God? art thou come hither to torment us before the time?

This indicates that demons know their fate on judgment day:

Jud 1:6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

Are demons all powerful and able to tell all the future? Maybe, maybe not. But they know enough to trick people into using them for such things as fortune telling, seances and what not.

48 posted on 04/15/2006 6:33:41 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
Oh yes, I'm pretty familiar with the reasoning behind why these decisions were made. I don't agree with them.

Yes, you would agree more with the side that were called "Judaizers."

Unfortunately orthodoxy went to far.

Yes, that's what they would say.

I'm afraid that you're under the impression that I'm advocating Judaism.

No, just the Judaism at the time of Christ - something that cannot be unless one can, or tries to, freeze time.

My understanding is that tradition can supercede scripture in the Catholic church.

Not supercede. They both share the same source.

Tradition is great, but when it disagrees with scripture I'm sticking with scripture.

Yes, that's what one does according to your tradition.

However, disagreement is in the eyes of the beholder. For example, in my eyes, your sola scriptura disagrees. And you follow your tradition instead of scripture in this case.

49 posted on 04/15/2006 6:37:47 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Yes, you would agree more with the side that were called "Judaizers."

Nope. What you call "Judaizers" were those who wanted to impose all the Pharasetical, non-biblical rules and regulation that had accumulated over the centuries.

No, just the Judaism at the time of Christ - something that cannot be unless one can, or tries to, freeze time.

Not correct. Christ didn't even agree with the Judaism of the time:

Mar 7:2 And when they saw some of his disciples eat bread with defiled, that is to say, with unwashen, hands, they found fault.
Mar 7:3 For the Pharisees, and all the Jews, except they wash their hands oft, eat not, holding the tradition of the elders.
Mar 7:4 And when they come from the market, except they wash, they eat not. And many other things there be, which they have received to hold, as the washing of cups, and pots, brazen vessels, and of tables.
Mar 7:5 Then the Pharisees and scribes asked him, Why walk not thy disciples according to the tradition of the elders, but eat bread with unwashen hands?
Mar 7:6 He answered and said unto them, Well hath Isaiah prophesied of you hypocrites, as it is written, This people honoreth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me
Mar 7:7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
Mar 7:8 For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.
Mar 7:9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.

This are the "Judaizers" you're worried about, not those who follow the commandments of God in scripture. You're failing to discern the difference.

50 posted on 04/15/2006 6:50:07 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

Do you think Pharisees were the only jews at the time? Or the Sadducees? Far far from it.


51 posted on 04/15/2006 7:10:16 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Do you think Pharisees were the only jews at the time? Or the Sadducees? Far far from it.

I don't think that at all. But I do think that they were the ones that were primarily what you called "Judaizers", the ones who persecuted the church of God.

52 posted on 04/15/2006 7:20:45 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
My point being Christ didn't disagree "with the Judaism of the time" but with how some jews practiced and corrupted it. Most especially the Pharisees who believed that their sorry situation was God's punishment and if they could become more holy and pure in the laws, He would save them.

But to say Jesus disagreed with Judaism is a bit silly I think.

53 posted on 04/15/2006 7:23:05 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

Easter Eggs for Geeks...
http://www.eeggs.com/
http://www.pcworld.com/howto/article/0,aid,109378,00.asp


54 posted on 04/15/2006 7:27:46 PM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

I'm wondering about - as far as your particular offshoot - whether you still follow the other teachings of Armstrong.
I believe the current larger group has dropped the Arianism bits and I know you're keeping the Seventh-day teaching.

How about the Armstrong's Anglo-Israelism and Pyramidology? Is that gone for your group also?


55 posted on 04/15/2006 7:33:06 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
My point being Christ didn't disagree "with the Judaism of the time" but with how some jews practiced and corrupted it. Most especially the Pharisees who believed that their sorry situation was God's punishment and if they could become more holy and pure in the laws, He would save them. But to say Jesus disagreed with Judaism is a bit silly I think.

No it's not. He disagreed strongly with what had become the predominant religion of what claimed to be the religion of the true God. Most importantly, he didn't disagree with anything that was scriptural, such as the holy days or the sabbath, but only the traditions and attitudes of those who practiced it.

56 posted on 04/15/2006 7:35:36 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
But I do think that they were the ones that were primarily what you called "Judaizers"

No, no, no. Gosh no. Not the Pharisees at all. I'm using the term as it's used in Christian history. These were Christians who believed that gentile followers of Jesus needed to become Jewish proselytes and observe the requirements of Judaism.

57 posted on 04/15/2006 7:36:52 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
I'm wondering about - as far as your particular offshoot - whether you still follow the other teachings of Armstrong. I believe the current larger group has dropped the Arianism bits and I know you're keeping the Seventh-day teaching.
How about the Armstrong's Anglo-Israelism and Pyramidology? Is that gone for your group also?

First of all I would disagree that Armstrong created anything new. For example, most of the doctrine he espoused can be found in the writings of people throughout the centuries. For example, E.W. Bulling printed "The Companion Bible" in the late 1910's (I believe). It is essentially a study bible. His notes echo many of the doctrines that Armstrong later was led to.

Armstrongs greatest work was to publish and preach the gospel. I think his organization was effective in that regard, but was lacking in fulfilling the spiritual needs of those under his care. I don't think that was his fault, but was more of a function of people trying to gain power within the organization.

As far as beliefs, United publishes The United States and Great Britain in Bible Prophecy which does propose that the descendents of Israel exist today primarily as the people of Great Britain and the United States. I think it makes sense.

I wasn't aware that Armstrong embraced Pyramidology and don't recall ever reading about it either. In either case, United doesn't have any doctrine concerning it.

The booklet Fundamental Beliefs should address any other doctrinal questions you have.

58 posted on 04/15/2006 7:48:35 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

I'd call 1910 "new," but I maybe I'm picky.

Is your group not aligned with this one: http://www.wcg.org ?


59 posted on 04/15/2006 7:52:01 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
These were Christians who believed that gentile followers of Jesus needed to become Jewish proselytes and observe the requirements of Judaism.

Who were originally of the Pharisaic sect and still considered their allegiance to the beliefs of the sect for salvation rather than the the sacrifice of Christ.

Act 15:5 But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses.

60 posted on 04/15/2006 7:52:16 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson