Skip to comments.
Communion "Host" in Dallas Church Grew Fungi, Bacteria Naturally
Texas Catholic ^
| 3-24-06
| Marty Perry
Posted on 03/24/2006 6:06:40 AM PST by marshmallow
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 381 next last
To: Religion Moderator
Fine. Wouldn't want to accuse people of worshipping vomit mold or anything.
To: HarleyD
You ought to be ashamed of yourself. But you're not. Why should I be? There is some truth hidden in that poem.
Don't worry. I'll do you a favor and be ashamed for you. Consider it an act of charity.
To: Conservative til I die; All
There is a difference between an attack against another poster, personally, and an attack against the group to which he belongs or its doctrine.
To: murphE
The bible is a Catholic bookplease elaborate
244
posted on
03/25/2006 1:57:36 PM PST
by
Revelation 911
(God is love, Love endures forever, Love God, Love your neighbor, Vengeance is mine)
To: Religion Moderator
There is a difference between an attack against another poster, personally, and an attack against the group to which he belongs or its doctrine.
Believe me, I'm not trying to push the issue, but the Eucharist is the source, center, and summit of the Catholic faith. The consecrated Eucharist is believed to be Christ Himself...literally. It's highly offensive to flippantly refer to it as vomit mold, the way that it's been mocked on this thread. A thread, might I add, where no Catholic was trying to prove this alleged miracle, or using it to prove any other doctrine.
It was just yet another springboard for certain Catholic-haters (and that's all they are at heart) to launch another attack. Just like *every* other Catholic themed thread.
To: Revelation 911
The bible is a Catholic book please elaborate
More accurately the New Testament is a Catholic book. It was written by Catholics inspired by God, and then collected, debated, and canonized by the Cathoolic Church. There was no such thing as a Protestant until the 1500s.
To: Conservative til I die
More accurately the New Testament is a Catholic book. It was written by Catholics inspired by God, and then collected, debated, and canonized by the Cathoolic Church. There was no such thing as a Protestant until the 1500s. Hmm - as a Prottie Pastor thanks for the edumacation
But you know - I looked all through my Catholic Bible (yes I still use it over the KJV,NIV) and cant find an epistle or letter or gospel to say we need to become Catholic.....everything I see says become a Christian
help me out here will you please and direct me to the verse
247
posted on
03/25/2006 2:36:09 PM PST
by
Revelation 911
(God is love, Love endures forever, Love God, Love your neighbor, Vengeance is mine)
To: Conservative til I die
Truly, every confession here (as well as atheism) suffers ridicule and contempt.
The same happened to Christ in His day, but He always responded with love and patience.
Some may say I am expecting too much of the Religion Forum posters, but I do not think so. The nature of the attack and the manner of the response are both testimony for the passers-by.
To: Revelation 911
But you know - I looked all through my Catholic Bible (yes I still use it over the KJV,NIV) and cant find an epistle or letter or gospel to say we need to become Catholic.....everything I see says become a Christian
I think you are playing a game of "move the goalposts". I'll bite, though. The reason no one was admonished to become "a Catholic" is simply because at the time there was no other Church. One was either a Christian or they weren't. There were no Pentecostals, Anglicans, or Mormons back then. And to be a Christian meant to be Catholic.
Of course, the name "Catholic" is not a brand name for a particular sect. It seems that way now because there are so many sects out there. "Catholic" is an adjective that translates to "universal."
At this point, the debate should rather be "How do we know the original Christian Church was Catholic?"
To: Religion Moderator
Some may say I am expecting too much of the Religion Forum posters, but I do not think so. The nature of the attack and the manner of the response are both testimony for the passers-by.
I agree.
To: PetroniusMaximus
How can an apostate (intentional apostate) intend to do what the Church intends? That is a requirement for validity, along with proper form and proper matter. By very definition a Satanic intent would render it invalid.
To: marshmallow
What was the miraculous change?
Becky
Comment #253 Removed by Moderator
To: Conservative til I die
"JESUS was very straight forward when he discussed salvation.
If so, then why do we have so many differences of opinion on His teachings, whether Protestant, Catholic, or Orthodox Christian?
But yes, you are correct that Jesus was pretty straightforward."
____________________________________________
How do you like that we agree about something. Jesus was pretty straight forward.
I think you see so many denominations within Christianity for several reasons. The pattern seems to be when a church becomes so strong politically and so large as an institution it tends to start teaching and interpreting SCRIPTURE in a manner that benefits the institution. When a church falls into this pitfall there are always going to be those believers who seeking to stay true to the LORD and grow in their Christian walk who will leave the old and form the new.
As a Baptist, I respond to your "transubstantiated" wafer that turned out to be moldy as idolatry because you do bow down and pray to the wafer. I don't "hate" you, and am not "anti-Catholic" I just think your wrong about your transsubstantiated wafer.
254
posted on
03/25/2006 4:03:21 PM PST
by
wmfights
(Lead, Follow, or Get Out Of The WAY!)
To: Alex Murphy; HarleyD; Frumanchu; irishtenor; ears_to_hear; Dr. Eckleburg; Forest Keeper; ...
You wrote:
"What a surprise - The wafer was consecrated, but transubstantiation didn't take place. It's still a wafer." You evidently don't know what transubstantiation is. It is a threefold miracle: (1) the substance of the bread or wine is gone (2) Christ is entirely present: body, blood, soul and divinity (3) the appearances (physical and chemical properties) remain the same.
That means that a consecrated host --- which is Christ --- can get digested; can get stale; can get moldy. Christ intends to be our food, so getting digested isn't a problem: it's how we receive him bodily. Getting stale or moldy, though, is undesirable because such deterioration interferes with the symbolic value of the appearance of bread as being wholesome, nourishing.
To reiterate: the appearance of bread and wine is symbolic. The presence of Christ is bodily, substantial, and real.
255
posted on
03/25/2006 4:22:09 PM PST
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Praestet fides supplementum ...Sensuum defectui.)
To: P-Marlowe
"I say you are fooling yourself into believing that the wafer is physically anything other than a wafer." The Catholic Church teaches that the consecrated host still has the physical and chemical properties of bread. You apparently didn't realize that. Well, read and learn.
256
posted on
03/25/2006 4:27:32 PM PST
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Praestet fides supplementum ...Sensuum defectui.)
To: P-Marlowe
Of course Jesus was human. He called himself the Son of Man.
Hebrews argues that Jesus had to be fully human.
257
posted on
03/25/2006 4:33:08 PM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Pray for Our Troops!)
To: P-Marlowe
You asked,
"You tell me, what does it taste like? Human flesh or baked wheat?" Tastes like wheat.
And Whom do I receive? Jesus Christ Our Lord.
I know you don't believe this. Fine. In John 6 it says that most of His hearers walked away from Jesus when he said, "Unless you eat my fleshand drink my blood, you do not have life within you." (The whole chapter bears careful reading.)
When the crowds left Him, did He chase after them saying, "Oh, come ON folks, Geez! It's just a metaphor!"?
John 6:66 After this many of his disciples turned back and no longer walked with him. 67 So Jesus said to the Twelve, Do you want to go away as well?
258
posted on
03/25/2006 4:36:38 PM PST
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Praestet fides supplementum ...Sensuum defectui.)
To: tenn2005
LOL.
Sorry but the Bible is Catholic book. You can lie to yourself as much as you want but from a purely historical viewpoint you are incorrect. Though I suspect that you know this but you lie to yourself so you can sleep at night.
To: marshmallow
![](http://www.joejaworski.com/bread/stir.jpg)
![](http://www.pickeringcreek.com/newcig.gif)
|
|
Sourdough starter. Who knew? |
260
posted on
03/25/2006 5:06:36 PM PST
by
Fintan
(Hey, you can't make this stuff up.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 381 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson