Organization Representing Canadian Religious Orders in Open, Major Public Dissent from Rome

Lifesite ^ | March 9, 2006 | John-Henry Westen

[NYer]

OTTAWA, March 7, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The Canadian Religious Conference (CRC), the official organization representing the over 200 religious congregations in Canada (groups of monks, nuns and priests organized into religious orders), has publicly voiced dissent to the teachings of the Catholic Church.  The controversial statements come in a letter and document written by Alain Ambeault C.S.V., the President of the Canadian Religious Conference, which intends to make suggestions to Canadian bishops as they go for their once-every-five-year visit with the Pope in the coming months.

"Today, I speak for the 230 religious congregations (sisters, brothers, priests) that live in this country," writes Ambeault in an intro letter to the document outlining concerns sent to the bishops. 

The document takes issue with Church teaching on divorce, contraception, condoms and even assisted suicide.  "We regret," says the CRC, "In terms of ethics and bioethics, the holding up of an ideal that leaves little room for advancement and progress; the defence of principles that do not reflect human experience (divorce, contraception, protection against AIDS, alleviation of suffering at the end of life)."

The document further laments Church teaching against homosexuality.  "We regret," the document says, "The legalistic image of the Catholic Church - and of our Canadian Church - its rigidity and its intransigent stands on sexual morals; its lack of openness regarding access to the sacraments for divorced and remarried Catholics, its lack of compassion for them; its unwelcoming attitude towards homosexuals."

The CRC takes direct and unabashed aim at 'Rome' - meaning the authority of the Pope.  The document says "we regret . . . The unconditional alignment of our Church with directives issued from Rome."  It later slams the Pope and the Vatican curia for insisting that the integrity of faith be maintained.  As the CRC puts it, they regret: "The rigidity of the directives of Roman documents: the insistence on the observance of rules rather than taking into account the life experiences of participants."

Despite the fact that Pope John Paul II ruled definitively on the matter, the CRC lobbies numerous times in the brief for women priests.

Finally the CRC asks the Catholic Church to be open even to homosexual 'marriage'.  "We hope," says the document, "That our Bishops create opportunities for discussion and discernment; engaging in the questions and problematic situations raised in today's society: . . . the place of women in the Church, marriage between persons of the same sex, assisted suicide."

While Ambeault claims to speak for all the religious congregations, that contention is hotly contested.  Basilian Father Alphonse de Valk, told LifeSitenews.com "The CRC certainly doesn't speak for me.  They may be speaking for a number of those religious congregations but certainly not for all of them."   Rev. de Valk, the editor of Catholic Insight magazine, said, "the more recent history of CRC includes heavy involvement in new age thinking and recently Fr. Renshaw associated with the CRC came out as one who no longer accepts the church teaching on homosexual tendencies."

That reference is familiar to LifeSiteNews.com readers since Rev. Richard Reshaw, C.S.C., former Assistant Secretary General of the Canadian Religious Conference (1994-2002), revealed himself as homosexual and supportive of the 'gay culture' on Canadian national radio in December. (see coverage
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/dec/05120601.html )

See the CRC cover letter and document here:
http://www.crc-canada.org/bd/fichierNouveaute/284_2.pdf
http://www.crc-canada.org/main.cfm?nID=283&nssid=503&...

To express concerns to the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops:
cecc@cccb.ca

To respectfully contact individual Canadian bishops, click on dioceses within each region of Canada
http://www.cccb.ca/CatholicChurch.htm

---

[Lurker]

Why can't these people just start their own church where they don't have to deal with the 'reactionary' Church?

They can start the Our Transgendered Church Of Brokeback Mtn if they want to. Why do they always insist that it is the mother organization which has to change?

L

[AnAmericanMother]

Well, a couple of reasons, both of which have to do with the fact that religious belief is NOT what we're really dealing with here.

1. They don't want to start their own church because they want the money and the prestige they can gain by hijacking a well-established church.

2. They also are trying to change the existing church because what they really want is approval and acceptance by "their" church -- because they think that way they can silence the still small voice in their minds that's whispering that what they are doing is wrong. . . .

[Nihil Obstat]

"The controversial statements come in a letter and document written by Alain Ambeault C.S.V., the President of the Canadian Religious Conference, which intends to make suggestions to Canadian bishops as they go for their once-every-five-year visit with the Pope in the coming months."

"Today, I speak for the 230 religious congregations (sisters, brothers, priests) that live in this country," writes Ambeault in an intro letter to the document outlining concerns sent to the bishops."

Thanks for your opinion, Pope Ambeault the 0. I'm sure Pope Benedict will be all ears. By the way, the use of Unabomber "We" is a nice touch in your screed.

[Romish_Papist]

"...its rigidity and its intransigent stands on sexual morals..."

Talk to Christ on that one, He made the rules.

"...its unwelcoming attitude towards homosexuals..."

They most certainly are welcome, but they must follow the rules like the rest of us.

"we regret . . . The unconditional alignment of our Church with directives issued from Rome." ...slams the Pope and the Vatican curia for insisting that the integrity of faith be maintained... they regret: "The rigidity of the directives of Roman documents: the insistence on the observance of rules rather than taking into account the life experiences of participants."

BS. What you want is to call yourself Catholic without actually being Catholic.

"...the place of women in the Church, marriage between persons of the same sex, assisted suicide..."

All of which have been defined. Don't like it? Join the Episcopagans. Stop trying to destroy my Church. Christ Jesus Himself said you would not prevail against Her.

[Romish_Papist]

Not to mention the Catholic Church is the one last great bastion standing between them and being able to shrug off the last feelings of guilt still clinging to them. It's the most influential, powerful organization in the world that challenges what THEY want to do, and they hate the Church for it. "How DARE that Church judge me! How DARE it try to impose rules on me!" They want to change the Roman Church to fit what THEY believe, but if they cannot, they will try to destroy it.

[trisham]

The CRC takes direct and unabashed aim at 'Rome' - meaning the authority of the Pope. The document says "we regret . . . The unconditional alignment of our Church with directives issued from Rome." It later slams the Pope and the Vatican curia for insisting that the integrity of faith be maintained. As the CRC puts it, they regret: "The rigidity of the directives of Roman documents: the insistence on the observance of rules rather than taking into account the life experiences of participants."

**************

I can't imagine why these people consider themselves to be Catholic. They are forcing Pope Benedict to respond to this tantrum.

[SaltyJoe]

It reads like a last stand rather than a line in the sand.

[It's me]

Apparently they're not Roman Catholic, are they?