[Cronos]

True -- Heterodoxy in the Roman Catholic Church refers to views that differ from strictly orthodox views, but retain sufficient faithfulness to the original doctrine to avoid heresy. By that definition, perhaps some aspects of the EO churches would be heterodox to us RCs (can't think of any right now). That doesn't mean that the Churches shouldnt' sit down and eventually move to a point where an ecumenical council is possible. By stating that the Catholic churches (or any of the Oriental Churches) is not Apostolic, you slam the door shut on ANY move towards reconciliation.

[x5452]

Actually the only reason heterodox is used rather than heretical is to promote dialog.

[kosta50]

By that definition, perhaps some aspects of the EO churches would be heterodox to us RCs

Actually, in schism. But, what most people don't understand is that the RCC does not see the Orthodox laity as schismatic; but only their Bishops. I would say the EOC treates the RC laity the same way. Schism between the East and the West is a profoundly ecclasiatical one, mixed with theology derived from different eclassiatiocal traditions.

For an Ecumenical Council to take place, it is absolutely necessary to reconcile the role of papal jurisdiction first (so that the Bishop of Rome can actually call for such a Synod). And, as was always the case, such Councils were convened when there were theological disputes. So, this VIII one would be no different.