No Suzy you misunderstand me -- I'm NOT blaming women for electing Gene Robinson. I am blaming the overall idea that went forth: people said "oh, let's change this and that, let's allow women priests, let's allow gay priests. It led to precedence"
They have the "if you can't beat them join them" mentality. The Catholic position seems to be "just because I can't stop you doesn't make it right, and doesn't mean I approve."
Which is the position of the loving parent?
-- but the results of women bishops in the Anglican communion seem dire: leading in a straight path to the rise of Gene Robinson.
I disagreed with you because the results of LEFTIST bishops lead straight (is straight an oxymoron here?) to a Gene Robinson, who is after all, as much a symptom of a deeper problem as he is a problem himself. The woman part may or may not be a problem of its own, but that is not the problem here. (I happen to think the woman part is not a problem).