"...Maybe you should stop praising your own expertise..."
If you can't argue with the message, then discredit the messager. I'm sure no Catholic would complain about Steve Hahn testimony. It certainly has been posted enough.
The answers ARE simplier than most care to admit. Clue: There is nothing that you have that has not been given to you by God.
I think we can all agree that the Missouri Synod of the Lutheran Church is the perfect compromise between the Catholic and the Protestant points of view.
Explain to me how one is three and three are one. If it is so "simple."
I am not attacking your personally, I am dumbfounded how you can sit there with a straight face and tell me there is nothing mysterious about God. Maybe your intepretation of Scripture is simple and without nuance, but that is not the same thing as saying concepts like the Trinity or the Incarnation are simple and unworthy of any deeper contemplation.
SD
The real question is who has the correct message? Unless a person has the correct interpretation of God’s word then the message can’t be trusted. The Catholic position on this is well known. There is no unified Protestant position. The only thing they can agree on is the Catholic Church is in error. That’s’ why I asked if you are the infallible interpreter ordained by God to keep everybody straight.
I'm sure no Catholic would complain about Steve Hahn testimony. It certainly has been posted enough.
You probably mean Scott Hahn. And yes, he’s a good source for the Catholic position.