Posted on 01/29/2006 3:52:07 PM PST by NYer
I have heard the terms "heresy," "apostasy" and "schism" used in describing people and beliefs not in agreement with our Catholic faith, but I suspect that those terms are often used incorrectly. What are their proper definitions?
The Church distinguishes three specific genres of what it calls the sin of "incredulity" (Catechism of the Catholic Church, no. 2089).
Heresy is the obstinate denial by someone baptized of a truth which is to be believed with divine and "catholic" faith, or it may be an obstinate doubt about such a truth.
Apostasy is the total repudiation of the Christian faith.
Schism is the refusal to submit to the authority of the pope or to join in communion with the members of the Catholic Church subject to him.
As one considers these various sins, it is important to consider the fullness of the Churchs moral theology concerning them. Theologians distinguish between "material" and "formal" sins.
A person is in material heresy if it is the result of his upbringing in a particular religious tradition to which he is faithful and he is not responsible for not knowing the revealed truth. A person who willingly professes what he knows to be contrary to revealed truth is a formal heretic, personally guilty of heresy.
These same moral principles apply to the sin of apostasy. Thus, a person would be a material apostate who either leaves the Church or abandons his relationship with Christ Himself. He would only be considered a formal apostate if he willfully and knowingly repudiated Christ Himself or the Church.
Lastly, a person who rejects the supreme authority of the Holy Father over the universal Church is materially a schismatic. Only the person who knowingly and willfully refuses to submit to papal authority or of joining in communion with the Catholic Church subject to him is to be considered a formal schismatic.
In the years between the Council of Trent and Vatican II, it was common to refer to members of Protestant churches simply as heretics without any proper or important distinctions being applied to that judgment.
Today, in the rightful pastoral charity called for by the council fathers of Vatican II, there is a greater sensitivity in our references to our "separated Christian sisters and brothers."
It simply is not appropriate to attribute moral culpability to those who belong to materially heretical or schismatic churches.
Those who are formally guilty of heresy, apostasy or schism may be subject to the penalty of excommunication depending upon whether the conditions outlined in the 1983 Revised Code of Canon Law, (numbers 1321-1323 and 1364). If subject to the penalty of excommunication, the person can usually go to confession to have the penalty lifted. Bishops generally delegate their priests or certain particular confessors with this faculty.
If recourse to a higher authority is necessary, the confessor will generally invite the person to return to confession and obtain the remission of the penalty from the bishop and communicate it to the person on his next visit to confession.
If you are referring to the Anabaptists, they were not only attacking the foundations of religion, but also those of civil society (does Münster ring a bell for you?), and the Catholic and Lutheran civil authorities in Germany and elsewhere were therefore justified in taking steps to suppress them, even if they sometimes went too far in particular cases.
One of the interesting things about heresy up through the late Middle Ages and the beginning of the early modern period is that it was often joined with agitation or rebellion against the state. This was because of how religious and civil life were so closely joined then, and it certainly provided a just, or at least understandable, cause for the suppression of heresy by the civil powers.
Hmm, the link above seems to have been corrupted due to the ü. But this should work:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Münster_Rebellion
Actually St. Polycarp is how we got St. Ignatius' letters in the first place. In his letter to the Phillippians, he writes:
Both you and Ignatius wrote to me, that if any one went [from this] into Syria, he should carry your letter with him; which request I will attend to if I find a fitting opportunity, either personally, or through some other acting for me, that your desire may be fulfilled. The Epistles of Ignatius written by him to us, and all the rest [of his Epistles] which we have by us, we have sent to you, as you requested. They are subjoined to this Epistle, and by them ye may be greatly profited; for they treat of faith and patience, and all things that tend to edification in our Lord. Any more certain information you may have obtained respecting both Ignatius himself, and those that were with him, have the goodness to make known to us.
Your obsession with names is puzzling. Historically speaking, the "Catholic Church" and the "Church of God" are both used to designate the same entity, the congregation of the faithful who are subject to their lawful pastors, originally established by our Lord Jesus Christ through his Holy Apostles. The nominal use of the note "catholic," and the other notes of the Church, became necessary to discriminate between the true Church and the false churches of the heretics, but the Church is certainly considered by the apostolic record to be one, holy, catholic, and apostolic, just as is professed in the Symbol of Faith.
"What's in a name? that which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet;"
Yes, you do have to say that.....when presented with scripture that contradicts your theology. I understand.
Huh? There's nothing in my theology that says the Church isn't the Church of God. Do you think we Catholics believe we belong to a Church of Man or something?
Therefore, my Lord, neither have we written with that confidence, as though we could persuade thee, if thou resistest, but in that faith by which we would not deny thee an entrance to holy peace, if thou wiliest. Which peace if it be after thine own soul and heart, there ought to be no contest about the name of Catholic. For if it is through God that our people obtain this name, no question is to be raised, when Divine authority is followed. If through man, you must discover when it was first taken. Then, if the name is good, no odium rests with it; if ill, it need not be envied. The Novatians, I hear, are called after Novatus or Novatian; yet it is the sect which I accuse in them, not the name: nor has any one objected their name to Montanus or the Phrygians.But under the Apostles, you will say, no one was called Catholic. Be it thus. It shall have been so. Allow even that. When after the Apostles heresies had burst forth, and were striving under various names to tear piecemeal and divide the Dove and the Queen of God, did not the Apostolic people require a name of their own, whereby to mark the unity of the people that were uncorrupted, lest the error of some should rend limb by limb the undefiled virgin of God? Was it not seemly that the chief head should be distinguished by its own peculiar appellation? Suppose, this very day, I entered a populous city. When I had found Marcionites, Apollinarians, Cataphrygians, Novatians, and others of the kind who call themselves Christians, by what name should I recognise the congregation of my own people, unless it were named Catholic? Come tell me, who bestowed so many names on the other peoples? Why have so many cities, so many nations, each their own description? The man who asks the meaning of the Catholic Name, will he be ignorant himself of the cause of his own name if I shall enquire its origin? Whence was it delivered to me? Certainly that which has stood through so many ages was not borrowed from man. This name "Catholic" sounds not of Marcion, nor of Apelles, nor of Montanus, nor does it take heretics as its authors.
Many things the Holy Spirit hath taught us, Whom God sent from Heaven to the Apostles as their Comforter and Guide. Many things reason teaches us, as Paul saith, and honesty, and, as he says, nature herself. What! Is the authority of Apostolic men, of Primitive Priests, of the most blessed Martyr and Doctor Cyprian, of slight weight with us? Do we wish to teach the teacher? Are we wiser than he was, and are we puffed up by the spirit of the flesh against the man, whom his noble shedding of blood, and a crown of most glorious suffering, have set forth as a witness of the Eternal God? What thinkest thou of so many Priests on this same side, who throughout the whole world were compacted together in one bond of peace with this same Cyprian? What of so many aged Bishops, so many Martyrs, so many Confessors? Come say, if they were not sufficient authorities for the use of this name, are we sufficient for its rejection? And shall the Fathers rather follow our authority, and the antiquity of Saints give way to be emended by us, and times now putrifying through their sins, pluck out the grey hairs of Apostolic age? And yet, my brother, be not troubled; Christian is my name, but Catholic my surname. The former gives me a name, the latter distinguishes me. By the one I am approved; by the other I am but marked. (St. Pacian of Barcelona, First Epistle to Sympronian, On the Catholic Name, Repentance, & Baptism)
I read your entire response and found no scripture quote to back up your statements....where on the other hand I had shown you earlier that Jesus prayed in John 17:11 that God would protect the Church in his (God's) own name. That's why we call it "The Church of God" to this very day. If you and your fellow Catholics feel that this is unimportant....fine. If you think Jesus was serious....you had better change the name of your Church. Catholic is the wrong name. Roman Catholic is even worse!
Which is not necessary where tradition or reason can suffice. St. Pacian defends quite well the term from the ancient and uninterrupted tradition of Christ's own Catholic Church.
where on the other hand I had shown you earlier that Jesus prayed in John 17:11 that God would protect the Church in his (God's) own name. That's why we call it "The Church of God" to this very day
"Let them, as fathers in Christ, take care of the faithful whom they have begotten by baptism and their teaching. Becoming from the heart a pattern to the flock, let them so lead and serve their local community that it may worthily be called by that name, by which the one and entire people of God is signed, namely, the Church of God." (Vatican Council II, Dogmatic Constitution on the Catholic Faith, no. 28)
"With the awareness, certainly, of our human weakness, yet with all the strength impressed on our spirit by such a command, we shall accordingly make a profession of faith, pronounce a creed which, without being strictly speaking a dogmatic definition, repeats in substance, with some developments called for by the spiritual condition of our time, the creed of Nicea, the creed of the immortal tradition of the holy Church of God." (Pope Paul VI, Remarks on the Credo of the People of God, June 30, 1968)
Again, you appear to be laboring under the misconception that the Catholic Church does not regard itself as the 'Church of God.' It certainly does so. But nothing in the Holy Scriptures prevents the use of the note 'catholic' to distinguish the true Church from the false churches of heretics and schismatics.
where on the other hand I had shown you earlier that Jesus prayed in John 17:11 that God would protect the Church in his (God's) own name.
Which nowhere requires the exclusive use of the term "Church of God" to describe the Church:
Et iam non sum in mundo, et hi in mundo sunt, et ego ad te venio.
Pater sancte, serva eos in nomine tuo, quod dedisti mihi, ut sint unum sicut nos.And now I am not in the world, and these are in the world, and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep them in thy name whom thou has given me; that they may be one, as we also are. (St. John 17:11)
For a while therefore He condescendeth to them, because had He said, "I keep them," they would not have so well believed; wherefore He saith, "Holy Father, keep them through Thine own Name"; that is, "by thy help." (St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Gospel of St. John, 81)
The 'rapture,' being purely the invention of men, will never happen.
If the Church on earth is not knit together by social bonds, it is not a real body of men. +Paul speaks quite differently from you in Chapter 4 of the Epistle to the Ephesians, where he writes:
"But doing the truth in charity, we may in all things grow up in him who is the head, even Christ: From whom the whole body, being compacted and fitly joined together, by what every joint supplieth, according to the operation in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body, unto the edifying of itself in charity." (vv. 15-16)
The Church on earth is constituted of all truly baptized men who profess the catholic and apostolic faith and subject themselves to the Pope and the bishops in communion with him, and have not been cut off from her by the sword of excommunication. There is no 'invisible Church' to be distinguished from the visible Church: the Church on earth is of her nature a social body and hence visible. This one Church is certainly the Mystical Body of Christ on earth and to her the promises of everlasting life pertain (cf. St. Matthew 16:18-19).
The first "Baptist" Congregation was formed in London, England in 1617. Anabaptists were not the same thing.
The first "Baptist" Congregation was formed in London, England in 1617. Anabaptists were not the same thing.
Oh jeez....get over it already. :)
"The Church on earth is constituted of all truly baptized men who profess the catholic and apostolic faith and subject themselves to the Pope and the bishops in communion with him,"
Salvation in Christ alone:
Rom 10:8 But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach;
9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
11 For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
12 ¶ For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Acts 16:31 And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.
1 John 5:13 These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.
Act 4:10 Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole.
11 This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner.
12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.
Pope, Priest:
Matthew 23:9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
Again just in the BOOK
"Do I dare say that I like the term heretic better than saying "our separated brothers and sisters". I don't say that to be mean but simply to show the significance of their error."
And, as one of those "heretics," I say, with my brother Martin, "Unless I am convinced by the testimonies of the Holy Scriptures or evident reason (for I believe in neither the Pope nor councils alone, since it has been established that they have often erred and contradicted themselves), I am bound by the Scriptures that I have adduced, and my conscience has been taken captive by the Word of God; and I am neither able nor willing to recant, since it is neither safe nor right to act against conscience. God help me. Amen. "
Other than that, we don't have that much separating ourselves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.