To: xzins; jwalsh07; ralice; onedoug; BibChr; Buggman; Blzbba; JCEccles; Alex Murphy; eleni121; ...
This is not going to be the definitive statement on ID by the Vatican, nor is it going to be the last. There is actually a big argument within the Church hierarchy over this issue. The Archbishop of Vienna, a close colleague of Pope Benedict XVI, is a proponent of ID, and on the other side, the Vatican astronomer, is against it (he's a Jesuit). There was an article recently in the publication Inside the Vatican about the debate.
40 posted on
01/18/2006 6:26:42 PM PST by
Pyro7480
(Sancte Joseph, terror daemonum, ora pro nobis!)
To: Pyro7480
There is actually a big argument within the Church hierarchy over this issue.
.................................................
Well that's the problem with the Roman Branch of Christianity...it's too Pope based and not enough Christ based.
41 posted on
01/18/2006 6:29:29 PM PST by
eleni121
('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
To: Pyro7480
March for Life Monday Pyro. We'll be there.
46 posted on
01/18/2006 6:52:49 PM PST by
jwalsh07
To: Pyro7480
This is not going to be the definitive statement on ID by the Vatican, nor is it going to be the last. There is actually a big argument within the Church hierarchy over this issue. The Archbishop of Vienna, a close colleague of Pope Benedict XVI, is a proponent of ID, and on the other side, the Vatican astronomer, is against it (he's a Jesuit). There was an article recently in the publication Inside the Vatican about the debate.***************
Excellent analysis. I believe you are quite correct. Does the fact that the paper published this article make it an official statement by the Vatican? It seems that is what some have inferred.
82 posted on
01/19/2006 2:36:51 AM PST by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson