Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: GSlob
I'm pretty sure there aren't a lot of scientific publications accepting works opposed to TOE so the peer-reviewed articles are kind of a joke.
14 posted on 01/17/2006 7:02:12 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: mlc9852

bump


15 posted on 01/17/2006 7:52:09 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852
Look at the same J. Philippe Rushton for an example of what a non-PC world-renowned scientist looks like: [his recent works available online at http://www.ssc.uwo.ca/psychology/faculty/rushton_pubs.htm]. With the article titles like "Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability" if anything, your argument about being so un-PC that he wouldn't be able to publish in peer-reviewed journals would apply to him first and foremost - but "he has published nearly 200 articles. In 1992 the Institute for Scientific Information ranked him the 22nd most published psychologist and the 11th most cited".
23 posted on 01/17/2006 9:56:21 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson