There is no cliff mentioned in scripture regarding this incident.
Secondly, the scripture in Acts says "headfirst". A hanged body does not fall headfirst.
Witnesses may often see things differently. One may say the day was sunny, another may say there was cloud cover. Only one may be right.
Finally, we do not know for sure whether these were first hand witnesses or this was information passed on over the years like the old game of "telephone" the facts are diluted. I believe in both cases, the Books were written after the fact.
You've stiched together a conclusion that is not found in the scriptures. Your theory may be correct or it may be in error. But it is not supported in the writings of the scriptures.
And yes, there are others.
It is inferred.
Secondly, the scripture in Acts says "headfirst". A hanged body does not fall headfirst.
The greek word does not state that it was "head first". It has been translated as "headlong" from a word which means a proned position. Assuming it was headfirst, if he was hanging and his feet hit ground first and then he went over a cliff, his body would have inverted and he would have gone headfirst. There is no contradiction there.
Witnesses may often see things differently. One may say the day was sunny, another may say there was cloud cover. Only one may be right.
It depends on their own location and the time of observation. The descriptions here are not mutually exclusive. They can be and have been logically reconciled.
And yes, there are others.
Bring 'em on. Start a thread.