Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sionnsar
Though IMHO it is a shame that the "Anglican Use" drafters felt the need to draw from the 1979 BCP -- when I read the Anglican Use it felt so familiar... right up until the bits ripped from the '79 clanked in my ear.

That isn't quite what happened. The 1979 BCP cribbed from the 1970 Missale Romanum (the "Novus Ordo") and the Anglican Use also took some stuff from the Novus Ordo. (Some of which they were required to take for doctrinal reasons; the 1928 Episcopal liturgy isn't entirely suitable for Catholic use.)

12 posted on 12/15/2005 7:02:49 AM PST by Campion ("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Campion

Ah. I recognized that some parts of the "Anglican Use" had to have come from somewhere else because they certainly weren't in either the '28 or the '79, but I am perfectly happy to agree (not knowing one way or the other) that the truly clunky parts I recognize from the '79 were lifted by its tin-eared drafters from the Novus Ordo also.


13 posted on 12/15/2005 7:32:15 AM PST by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || To Libs: You are failing to celebrate MY diversity! || Iran Azadi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson