Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic bishops denounce capital punishment
The Boston Globe ^ | 11.16.05 | Charles A. Radin

Posted on 11/16/2005 10:09:15 AM PST by Coleus

The US Conference of Catholic Bishops yesterday overwhelmingly approved a new statement of opposition to capital punishment, asserting that it contributes to a culture of death and violence in the United States.

It was the bishops' first comprehensive statement on the death penalty in 25 years, and coincided with the debate in the Massachusetts House of Representatives on a proposal to reinstate capital punishment in the Bay State. Massachusetts is one of 12 states in which the death penalty is prohibited.

The bishops, who are holding their annual meeting in Washington, said their longtime opposition to capital punishment is being renewed and strengthened by new teachings and new support for abolition of the death penalty growing out of the Gospel of Life encyclical issued by the late Pope John Paul II.

Citing John Paul's teachings, the bishops declared that ''the death penalty is not intrinsically evil, as is the taking of human life through abortion or euthanasia," but ''in contemporary society, where the state has other, nonlethal means to protect its citizens, the state should not use the death penalty."

Archbishop Sean P. O'Malley of Boston, who has strongly opposed the restoration of capital punishment in Massachusetts since Governor Mitt Romney proposed reinstating it last year, said in an interview that a ''sea change" is occurring among Catholics, who in the past have shown strong support for the death penalty.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic
KEYWORDS: bishops; capitalpunishment; crime; deathpenalty; murder; navelgazers; usccb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 11/16/2005 10:09:15 AM PST by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Citing John Paul's teachings, the bishops declared that ''the death penalty is not intrinsically evil, as is the taking of human life through abortion or euthanasia," but ''in contemporary society, where the state has other, nonlethal means to protect its citizens, the state should not use the death penalty."

Yeah, when you have convicted murderers escaping from prison, somehow the death penalty looks more attractive.

2 posted on 11/16/2005 10:13:16 AM PST by Pyro7480 (Sancte Joseph, terror daemonum, ora pro nobis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Yeah, when you have convicted murderers escaping from prison, somehow the death penalty looks more attractive .>>>
 
Escape?
 
In NJ, the democrats just let the cop killers go free. 
 
trantino

3 posted on 11/16/2005 10:20:08 AM PST by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

But it does not follow that death penalty is the only answer to escaping prisoners. The same energy that today goes to fight for death penalty, and then to making sure the convicts are actually executed could be better applied to securing prisons, bringing about just sentences, and toughening the parole system.


4 posted on 11/16/2005 10:23:14 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: annalex

My main point in opposing the bishops on this, though they do clarify the morality of the death penalty, is the fact they are contradicting traditional Catholic teaching. St. Thomas Aquinas believed the death penalty, for grave crimes, was just.


5 posted on 11/16/2005 10:25:49 AM PST by Pyro7480 (Sancte Joseph, terror daemonum, ora pro nobis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: annalex

No, executing them is better.


6 posted on 11/16/2005 10:30:38 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I think they'd do better to concentrate more on ending abortion.


7 posted on 11/16/2005 10:37:28 AM PST by Carpe Cerevisi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I wish they would denounce the way mass is said in most churches on Sunday. *sigh* I guess one can still have dreams!


8 posted on 11/16/2005 10:44:45 AM PST by badabing98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
So if the death penalty is not intrinsically evil but abortion is, why are they focusing on that?

To deny the death penalty for the most heinous acts is to insist on life for evil.

9 posted on 11/16/2005 10:49:02 AM PST by Gerish (Choose God, he has already chosen you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

It is just if applied justly across the board. E.g. X murders Y. X is executed. That is just. Now, X1 murders Y1, X2 murders Y2, ... X1000 murders Y1000. X7 and X707 are executed, the other 998 get twenty out in ten and a cable TV in the cell. Now it is not just.

Second point. Aquinas had a government that looked to the Church for moral teaching. We have a government that looks to the election results for moral teaching, and explicitly disavows any loyalty to the Church. Aquinas's government could be trusted with more power than a democratic government should be. The modern state is too powerful and too hostile to man, to be allowed to kill.


10 posted on 11/16/2005 10:51:13 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
The US Conference of Catholic Bishops yesterday overwhelmingly approved a new statement of opposition to capital punishment, asserting that it contributes to a culture of death and violence in the United States.

The US Conference of Catholic Bishops need to read and obey the Holy Word of G-d!

Genesis 9:5 And for your lifeblood I will surely demand an accounting. I will demand an accounting from every animal. And from each man, too, I will demand an accounting for the life of his fellow man.

Genesis 9:6 “Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made man.

The commandment requiring the death penalty is not allegorical.

b'shem Y'shua

11 posted on 11/16/2005 10:54:58 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Y'shua <==> YHvH is my Salvation (Psalm 118-14))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
the state has other, nonlethal means to protect its citizens

Shouldn't there be a 'Cart Before The Horse' alert on this story? The nonlethal means of protection aren't quite what they could be. IMHO.

I noticed that in their interviews, they didn't interview anyone who was not a victim because their potential murderer was executed. Kind of hard to measure prevention.

Best argument against it? All those screwed up Illinois cases.

I'll be looking forward to another statement on this issue in another quarter century. Thanks, USCCB.

12 posted on 11/16/2005 10:56:00 AM PST by siunevada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annalex; Pyro7480

The fact that you both are debating the use of the death penalty proves that the bishops should not be expending energy on this issue. The matter is an issue of prudential judgment and not a moral absolute. I am glad that Bp. DiMarzio clarified that the idea of denying Communion to Catholics who support the death penalty would never be raised, and rightly so. The bishops have many other problems to deal with that concern moral absolutes/non-negotiable issues (eg. abortion, "gay marriage", Communion to self-excommunicated Catholics, etc.)


13 posted on 11/16/2005 11:00:40 AM PST by jrny (Oremus pro Pontifice nostro Benedicto Decimo Sexto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: annalex
the other 998 get twenty out in ten and a cable TV in the cell. Now it is not just.

So. Does twenty and out in ten seem an adequate nonlethal means of protecting the innocent to anyone?

Our pastoral authorities are way too trusting in the efficacy of the nonlethal means of protection as currently practiced by the secular authorities, IMO.

14 posted on 11/16/2005 11:02:35 AM PST by siunevada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jrny

Agree that it is secondary, but disagree that they should fudge it because it is secondary. Modern state is not morally qualified to kill.


15 posted on 11/16/2005 11:06:01 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: annalex
Modern state is not morally qualified to kill.

Your point is one I never considered. Thanks!

16 posted on 11/16/2005 11:08:00 AM PST by Pyro7480 (Sancte Joseph, terror daemonum, ora pro nobis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: siunevada

No, twenty out of ten is not adequate. Life without parole is adequate and ensuring uniformity of punishment is easier if the death penalty is not an option.


17 posted on 11/16/2005 11:08:33 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: annalex
twenty out in ten
18 posted on 11/16/2005 11:09:45 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: annalex
toughening abolishing the parole system.

Some years ago, we abolished parole in Virginia. Funny thing ... we don't have paroled convicted rapists, robbers, and murderers committing rape, robbery, and murder in Virginia.

19 posted on 11/16/2005 11:10:06 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

Well, it has its uses in giving an inmate a reason to behave, but it should not have the effect of halving sentences. And, of course, life should always be life.


20 posted on 11/16/2005 11:12:31 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson