Posted on 11/11/2005 5:51:08 AM PST by NYer
which denomination are we talking here?
It isn't in my church (Eastern Orthodox), firstly we have the sacrement of confession, and secondly we don't clasify sins.
http://www.oca.org/QA.asp?ID=153&SID=3
Eastern Orthodox is Catholic, yes?
My question is regarding protestant "born again" Christians. For example Baptists (or any other protestant denomination that uses the term "born again").
It's 'Catholic Like' I suppose. (It's very close up until around 1054)
http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/Great_Schism
I too would like to know what born-againers suggest for atrocious sins incured after being born again.
< /ignorance>"
You called? :)
"He who endures to the end will be saved" Matt. 24:13; cf. 25:3146
You're not at your end yet so don't jump the gun for your eternal soul's sake.
What a cruel joke God played on Jesus.
For what offense would you disown your own child ?
Would you disown them because they missed the weekly family meeting ?
You're making a fundamental mistake. God doesn't disown us. We disown Him. If your child chooses not to come to your weekly family meeting, who's disowning whom? And how can you have a relationship with a child who chooses not to be in your presence?
So how many weekly family meetings would a child of yours have to miss before you decided that they had disowned you ?
Why would you expect that someone who has disowned you would have any contact with you at all ?
One must have a genuine spirtual rebirth.
This, then, eliminates the mentally retarded? The autistic? The ignorant?
For all of these ... God is able.
But according to protestants he's NOT able for infants.
I'm afraid I miss the point. I do not believe in baptism of children. I believe in what they refer to as a Credobaptism - believer baptism. If I'm not mistaking the Catholic Church does baptize children but requires them to fulfill their catecism later.
Yes because baptism and beleif are separate things (as has been explicitly enumerated by several scriptural references thus far in the thread)
Then why are you picking on Luther baptizing kids?
I'm not picking on Luther I'm refering Luther as the begining of the protestant era. It wasn't until this era in history when people started revising baptism to exclude children. Until Luther went about willy nilly questioning and re-writing the work of the church the apotles setup no one decided to deprive children of baptism.
For all of these ... God is able.
But according to protestants he's NOT able for infants.
But of course He is.
No protestants teach that God will not save infants ... irregardless of whether they are baptized or not.
Numerous peach that you cannot baptise children, if God can send the Holy Spirit to the disabled and unable to think cognitively then when we in the Orthodox church pray for the Holy Spirit to come upon a child in Chrismation it is equally as feasible.
Numerous peach that you cannot baptise children, if God can send the Holy Spirit to the disabled and unable to think cognitively then when we in the Orthodox church pray for the Holy Spirit to come upon a child in Chrismation it is equally as feasible.
"I am still shocked anyone not among the twelve following Christ or those trained by the twleve can claim anyone's baptism was invalid."
"... the LORD seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart."
1 Sam 16
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.