To: redgolum; NYer; Salvation; Between the Lines; oprahstheantichrist; Clemenza; gamarob1; Valpal1; ...
To those who cut themselves off via a barren marriage:
Don't want to have kids? Fine.
Let these "dinks" (Duel Income No Kids) couples fund their own retirement. Don't let them put their child-free adulthood responsibilities upon our children and our children's children. If they don't invest in their own old age, then no one else should be held responsible.
It's anti-child, orgasm for the sake of the high attitudes of adults like these that push socialism upon the Natural Family.
If you want to pervert the Sacrament of Marriage, don't drag down the rest of society with you. Cut yourself loose and be on your own. Let your crime between you and your spouse remain only between your disgraced attitude and God. Don't include the rest of Humanity.
38 posted on
10/28/2005 9:58:53 AM PDT by
SaltyJoe
(A mother's sorrowful heart and personal sacrifice redeems her lost child's soul.)
To: SaltyJoe
Don't get me started on how us SINKs get screwed on taxes relative to you folks who are "Married With Children."
39 posted on
10/28/2005 9:59:57 AM PDT by
Clemenza
(Gentlemen, Behold!)
To: SaltyJoe
Let these "dinks" (Duel Income No Kids) couples fund their own retirement. Don't let them put their child-free adulthood responsibilities upon our children and our children's children. So by the same token, they shouldn't have to pay taxes to fund schools, right?
If they don't invest in their own old age, then no one else should be held responsible.
I agree completely. And this should apply whether or not you have kids.
51 posted on
10/28/2005 11:46:03 AM PDT by
ThinkDifferent
(I am a leaf on the wind)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson