Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Considering that it was the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (aka the Holy Office), headed by Benedict XVI, then Josef Cardinal Ratzinger, which enthusiastically stripped Hans Kung of his license as a Catholic theologian early in the pontificate of John Paul II of happy memory, one rather doubts that there will be any, even the slightest, rehabilitation of Hans Kung unless Kung strips himself of his infernal id and his heresies and his unearned pride and his resistance to Truth and then engages in public physical penance of Biblical proportions.


10 posted on 09/26/2005 8:57:07 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: BlackElk; Salvation; NYer; siunevada
I really liked Kung's "Does God Exist?" Thought it a very worthy book, but that was pre-stripping.

I'm still betting that the two are old pals.

After all, Kung's only crime was in disputing papal infallibility. See below....Link to Quote

Ratzinger goes on to support Kung's position versus the Theology of Rome, of which today he is the top representative... He stresses:

"I want to emphasize again that I decidedly agree with Kung when he makes a clear distinction between Roman theology (taught in the schools of Rome) and the Catholic Faith. To free itself from the constraining fetters of Roman Scholastic Theology represents a duty upon which, in my humble opinion, the possibility of the survival of Catholicism seems to depend" (Ibid., p. 101, last text highlighted at right).


11 posted on 09/26/2005 9:09:15 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson