Posted on 08/29/2005 5:23:59 PM PDT by sionnsar
Mmegi/The Reporter (Gaborone)
OPINION
August 26, 2005
Posted to the web August 26, 2005
By Bugalo Chilume
In African culture, homosexuality is taboo. President Robert Mugabe has been widely reported to have said that homosexuals are worse than pigs, which didn’t go down well with the West. Sam Nujoma is also known to have publicly unpalatable terms to describe homosexuality. In fact, he is reported to have ordered the arrest and deportation of homosexuals from Namibia.
Across the continent, homosexuality is a criminal offence, except in South Africa, where the minority white race was in power prior to majority rule - they ensured that the country’s new constitution guaranteed freedom of sexual orientation before relinquishing power to the Africans.
Traditional Christian teachings frown upon homosexuality, as does African culture. It is against this background that the majority of African Christians, Anglicans in particular, are agonising over the consecration of Gene Robinson, an openly gay American divorcee of two, as bishop of an Episcopal Church, the American version of the Anglican Church. Most are horrified, and the consecration was met with harsh condemnation across Africa. The Kenyan Anglican archbishop is reported to have lamented that, “the devil has clearly entered the church. God cannot be mocked”.
The majority of Anglican churches in Africa were against the consecration, with the notable exception of the South African church. Obviously, mindful of the provision of his country’s constitution, Njongokulu Ndungane, the Archbishop of Cape Town, is reported to have welcomed Robinson into the church’s fold: “Robinson has been consecrated by his province and that makes him a bishop of the church”.
In white societies, homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle - even same sex marriages are recognised under law and enjoy the same legal rights as heterosexual marriages. Robinson’s appearance at his nomination victory celebration with his gay partner by his side didn’t cause much of a ripple in the white Christian movement. His consecration had been a foregone conclusion despite spirited opposition from church leaders of non-white races, who make up about 70 percent of the worldwide Anglican membership.
To the dismay of many African Anglicans, the Archbishop of Canterbury and spiritual head of the Anglican Church (a.k.a. Church of England) didn’t rebuke the diocese in the US state of New Hampshire that firstly nominated and then consecrated Robinson. If anything, the archbishop was very accommodating in his remarks.
The current trials and tribulations of African Christians emanates from the fact that you cannot divorce indigenous culture from indigenous religion. When this happens, a society becomes dysfunctional, thus impeding its advancement economically, politically and spiritually.
Religion is the foundation upon which cultural values of a society are based; a framework within which these values function. By forsaking his own religion to embrace the religion of another race (white) that has totally different societal values from his, has left the African in a cultural limbo. As a result, African Christians, at least the Anglicans, are now in despair and utter confusion over the recent developments within the Anglican Church. Indeed, even without the consecration of the gay bishop, African Christians on the whole have always found it difficult to harmonise the spiritual demands of Christianity with their traditional African way of life.
Despite their opposition to the consecration of Robinson, there is nothing much the African and other non-white Anglicans can do to reverse this milestone in the Christian history, although they outnumber their white counterparts by far - clearly a master-servant relationship.
The consecration has taken place and the church has accepted it.
African Anglicans just have to bear it, toe the line and conform to the dynamics of the cultural values of their white masters, even if these are at loggerheads with their own African values.
Christianity is a religion of the white race, and therefore impervious to the cultural and social needs of its African and other non-white followers.
The near-hysterical opposition to contraceptives by the Vatican is incomprehensible, to say the least. Widespread poverty in Africa, where economic growth is largely stagnant, at best, makes it absolutely imperative that modern family planning methods be employed to contain runaway population growth; yet, the Roman Catholic Church instructs its many followers in Africa (and other developing parts of the world) not to use contraceptives. What is this?
Christianity is a white man’s religion that he rightly wants to be in tandem with the dynamics of his own culture, and, needless to say, culture evolves over time to accommodate changing needs of society.
Given the comparatively pitiful low levels of economic development in the continent, African culture hasn’t evolved to the same degree as European culture - hence the current deep cultural split between the races over the consecration of an openly gay bishop.
African Anglican ministers are reported to have accused their white counterparts of allowing their societies’ increasingly secular morals to corrupt the traditionalist beliefs of Anglicanism.
What do they know? African Christians accepted the white man’s religion when they were not party to its formation, now, what gives them the right to dictate to the owners of the religion?
Whites own the religion and should do whatever they damn well please with it!
In fact, over the years whites have made changes to their religion to suit the requirements of the times. Ineffectual gestures such as severing ties with the diocese of which Robinson is bishop is the most that African Anglican leaders can do to show their consternation at the consecration.
If, indeed, they believe that the consecration of an openly homosexual man as a bishop goes against the basic teachings of the Bible, and that it is an abomination, why don’t they break away from the Anglican Church altogether? The church has broken up many times in the past to spawn new Christian denominations over less contentious issues.
The sad truth is that there is nowhere for them to go, no other spiritual home, for they were party to the destruction of their own true spiritual home.
Meekly, they will toe the line because they have been conditioned to always obediently follow the white man wherever he leads them, even if it is to their own deaths. Poor Africans.
Copyright © 2005 Mmegi/The Reporter. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com).
In white societies, homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle -
No it is not.
Hogwash. "Eliminate poverty by eliminating poor people." Who is this putz, anyhoo?
No idea, but it makes the point that blacks can be racist too, no?
Yes, it does. And stupid, too ... just like people of any other race.
Bingo!
And he says this while supporting the birth-control agenda, which is specifically designed to keep the numbers of Africans down, and also has the side effect of guaranteeing the uncontrolled spread of AIDS. Nothing stops AIDS except Christian morality.
Sloppy thinking!
Apparently someone who is woefully ignorant of the history of the Christian Church, an ignorance which he demonstrates repeatedly by uttering such nonsense as:
Christianity is a religion of the white race...
I have neither the time nor the space to address all the errors -- both factual and conceptual -- contained in this article.
None of us does. I hope this person has no influence on anyone else!
White man's religion? What is he hiding? Which religion would he prefer the black man follow? Islam? They are enslaving the black man as we speak.
In part because ECUSA is an American church, and thus its leadership tend to be American.
I will note that if (or when) the worldwide Anglican Communion splits, the see for the orthodox side is extremely likely to be Abuja, Nigeria, with ++Akinola as the world leader. The rift lines that are forming will leave Canterbury with the downward-spiraling revisionists.
I appreciate your response. I did not know. I think your analysis is correct.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.