To: murphE
You're saying that if the guy who makes canon law, essentially the regent of the Catholic Church here on earth absent Jesus Christ, says you're excommunicated, but doesn't dot the 'i' or cross the 't' it's not a valid excommunication? That's gibberish.
And I'm about as SSPX-friendly as you can get without drinking the kool-aid.
109 posted on
08/31/2005 7:07:35 PM PDT by
WriteOn
(Truth)
To: WriteOn
In other words, you believe in the invented doctrine of papal impeccability. Don't you?
110 posted on
08/31/2005 7:50:33 PM PDT by
Gerard.P
(The lips of liberals drip with honey while their hands drip with blood--Bishop Williamson)
To: WriteOn
You're saying that if the guy who makes canon law, essentially the regent of the Catholic Church here on earth absent Jesus Christ, says you're excommunicated, but doesn't dot the 'i' or cross the 't' it's not a valid excommunication? That's gibberish.I'm saying a pope can be in error in his application of canon law, I'm not quite sure what you think I'm saying. Do you think that popes are protected from error with regard to application of canon law?
112 posted on
08/31/2005 9:15:05 PM PDT by
murphE
(These are days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed but his own. --G.K. Chesterton)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson