Well, it is certainly true to observe I did not engage in false irenecism :)
Btw, your reference to ecumenism is appreciated. Not many self-annointed trads admit the sspx is not in the church. Are you now conceeding Vatican Two is authoritative and binding ?
BTW, I forgot to give you kudos for your response to Bulldog Catholic's post about supposed heresy of the Pope.
Kudos
"Not many self-annointed trads admit the sspx is not in the church."
Your pre-Vatican II theology shows you out. This is not the language of the post-Conciliar Church.
Certain members of the SSPX may be in "imperfect communion" or they may be in the body, but not in the heart of the Church. And there is no true ecumenism with the SSPX as Cardinal Cassidy admitted some time ago, because "the SSPX is an internal matter of the Catholic Church."
But since nobody really knows what "true" ecumenism is, I thought I would use that. I don't supposed many people speak to, or of, their non-Catholic relatives or friends with the uncharity of those who speak to traditional Catholics here, just for the record.
Thanks for the kudos. If you have followed my posts at all over the past couple of years, you would know I have been hammered by many "to my right" just as much as NeoCons who can't seem to grip that things are quickly moving to the right of them. When SSPX reconciles, and the TLM is freed, then???