~~But one Jew, moved by malice, audaciously stretched forth his hand upon the bed and immediately received from divine judgment the wages of his audacity. Those daring hands were severed by an invisible blow. But when he repented and asked forgiveness, his hands were restored.~~
This scene is remeniscent of the Old Testament passage that relates how a man reached out and touched the Arc of the Covenant as it was appearing to him to be unstable. He did not apparently have any malice of intent, but rather feared that the Arc would fall, and he attempted to stabilize it. Immediately he was struck dead by divine intervention. There was no repentance, and no restoration. But this was before the Redemption of the cross. That the Jew who had touched the bed and endured punishment would be immediately healed harkens to the atonement Jesus accomplished for our salvation, and to the vast mystery of Baptism which wipes away original sin.
Also there is the association of the Arc with the Theotokos, which is an enduring theme of Scripture and the Fathers. As the Arc carried inside its "belly," all lined with gold (a figure of the immaculate soul of Our Lady) the three elements of the ancient religion, the rod of Aaron, the manna and the stone tablets of the Law, the Blessed Virgin Mary carried in her womb the Incarnate Word of the triune God. And especially here, where the Theotokos in dormition lies without sign of life, for the Arc was by common sense inanimate and appeared to be comprised of inanimate objects, her body was being carried like the Arc had been carried long ago, by men who reverently and diligently moved her about. However, just as the Arc, an apparently lifeless thing, was known to meet out justice upon transgressors instantly, here the body of the Virgin, as if protected at all times by an unseen army of angels, appears to be the source of instantaneous punishment of a transgressor. I say "appears" to be, for there is no mention of any obvious alternative. The big difference is, that his hands were restored immediately when he asked forgiveness.
What entity delivered the "invisible blow" that had severed his hands? And likewise, what (or who) was the cause of his hands being restored? Was it the Mother of God? Would she be of the character to effect such an injury? I suspect not. There is however a Biblical figure that would be appropriate: set at the entrance to the Garden of Eden was an angel with a flaming sword to guard it. It is not too illogical to suppose that anyone with malice of intent who tries to re-enter the Garden, the place of life without the curse of original sin, would be punished immediately by that angel wielding the sword, the flames of which are remeniscent of the flames of hell. And so too anyone who would attempt to touch Our Lady with any malice of intent, even to touch her seemingly lifeless body, would be faced with instantaneous consequence. This goes a long way to support understanding of her status of perpetual virgin.
From whence came the restoration of his hands? From whence is our salvation? Jesus saves us from hell, but He does so through the intercession of Our Blessed Mother. If not for her, Jesus would not have been born, the creator of the universe confined to the frame and substance of a helpless infant. He would not have been formed as a "mass of tissue" in her womb, the kind of entity that satanic abortionists today crave to destroy. We could say that Jesus gave him his hands back, but we would be more consistent with the whole picture if we would cough up the admission that it was the intercession of the Blessed Mother that made the difference. After all, it was HER BODY lying in state. Where was her soul? Was it separated from her body? That is the theological definition of death, after all. Where is the mention of her soul being "separated?" This quotation from the Orthodox book mentions her giving "up her all-holy spirit into the hands of her Son and God." That's quite beautifully stated! But does "givig up" presuppose the subsequent "taking away?" If she had CAUSED her own death, she would be guilty of suicide, and that is a sin, and she did not sin, ergo, "N.G." in engineering terms.
What's the point of all this? The point is, that when you or I face our eventual death, there is one person to whom we ought to not forget to remember: Theotokos. Who was present at the death of St. Joseph? The Blessed Virgin Mary and Jesus. Who was present at the death of Jesus on the cross? The Blessed Mother and St. John. Which witness is common to both events? When we face our last moments, the demons converge to accomplish their dirty work because if they can't get you then, they will never get you. They know that they have one last chance to tempt you to commit sin, and if they fail, they endure the product of their failure for all eternity. With the powers of hell all converging to attack us in our final agony, what better defense could we hope for than the kind of defense associated with Our Lady, an unseen flaming sword carried by an unseen guardian angel, delivering an "unseen blow" to slice the unseen devils to unseen shreds? If that isn't comforting, I don't know what is!
While such stories might not be necessary for someone to believe in order to be saved, their constancy and beauty are very helpful for nurturing a strong faith. The more of such things we have to think about the less time we have to ponder sinful thoughts, and the less desire we have to entertain impure inclinations. This is the teaching of the Theotokos, to reject sin, to renounce Satan and all his works, and to turn toward an unhesitating love of God for all eternity.
BTTT on the Solemnity of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary, August 15, 2006!