Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inclusive Church comment on the ACC
Thinking Anglicans ^ | 7/02/2005 | Inclusive Church

Posted on 07/02/2005 7:34:02 PM PDT by sionnsar

The ACC has created a serious challenge for the Anglican Church
original here

The result of the vote at the Anglican Consultative Council in Nottingham on Weds 22nd June represents a serious challenge to the future of the Anglican Church. It is vital that those who celebrate the breadth and depth of the Anglican tradition begin to take seriously the threat to the future of our church.

St Paul says in the first letter to the Corinthians ‘Now the body is not made up of one part, but of many…..The eye cannot say to the hand, “I do not need you.” ’ It is clear that the continued exclusion of the Episcopal Church of the USA and the Anglican Church of Canada, in spite of their open, honest and generous responses to the Windsor Report and the Primates’ request is a contradiction of the words of St Paul.

The preface to the Book of Common Prayer, published in 1662, opens with the words “It hath ever been the wisdom of the Church of England to keep the mean between two extremes.” The Church has lived with diversity and difference since its foundation. Anglicans from a vast breadth of theological and liturgical understandings have respected one another’s right to be members. The path has not always been easy but the Church has held together over nearly five centuries.

The Anglican Church has made a unique contribution to Christian witness. We have always been Catholic and Reformed, standing between the extreme certainties which caused such terror and suffering in the Reformation era. We are commtted to maintaining the value of that inheritance. We are not surprised when something that has so much within it that works for good and redemption is under attack.

But this Church that we love is now under threat. The Gospel of broad and generous inclusion is being undermined by a dangerously monochrome interpretation of scripture.

The loss of our voice; the change in our ecclesiology; the equating of our Anglican tradition with other hard-line, protestant, or neo-conservative churches would be a serious and permanent diminishing of Christian witness to the world.

InclusiveChurch and its thirteen partner organisations in the Church of England have welcomed the process of reception of the Windsor Report and the institution of the “Listening process” agreed by the Anglican Consultative Council. We are working closely with other groups within the Anglican Commuion, both in the UK and abroad. We are committed to this so that we can try to ensure that the ecclesiology of the Anglican Communion is not subverted.

The decision taken at the ACC meeting in Nottingham to include all the Primates as full members of the Anglican Consultative Council sets an alarming precedent. There is a real possibility of imposed doctrinal and theological positions from a conservative grouping.

We cannot risk becoming a church where the Primates can equate homosexuality with bestiality; or where there is permanent subjugation of women and institutionalised inequality; or where genuine debate and searching are replaced by an imposed orthodoxy.

We are aware that the Church faces very different challenges around the world, and we have no wish to exclude from the church those who have a different interpretation of the Gospel. But for the sake of the Church we repeat clearly that we are committed to finding ways to ensure that the diversity of the Anglican Communion continues to be celebrated and encouraged.

InclusiveChurch deeply regrets the continued exclusion of ECUSA and the Anglican Church of Canada from full participation in the life of the Anglican Communion. We express our full support for their respect for the Anglican Communion and their membership of it.

We believe that the Gospel witness we offer must continue to grow and to that end we call on all members of our Communion to become aware of the risks we are facing. ‘The eye cannot say to the hand - “I do not need you.”’

Giles Goddard

Executive Secretary
InclusiveChurch


TOPICS: Mainline Protestant
KEYWORDS: ecusa

1 posted on 07/02/2005 7:34:03 PM PDT by sionnsar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ahadams2; anselmcantuar; Agrarian; coffeecup; Paridel; keilimon; Hermann the Cherusker; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-7 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar and newheart.

Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com

Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15

2 posted on 07/02/2005 7:34:57 PM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || <Airbus A380)^: The BIG PIG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
I do NOT want any of whatever this guy is smoking.

He is clearly far, far out of touch with reality.

3 posted on 07/02/2005 7:43:43 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

later ping.


4 posted on 07/02/2005 7:45:02 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

Someone help me out here - isn't there something in Scripture about cutting off your hand or plucking out your eye if it offends?


5 posted on 07/02/2005 9:05:02 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonF

Yup. And that's what I was thinking of when I first read this..


6 posted on 07/02/2005 9:29:56 PM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || <Airbus A380)^: The BIG PIG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

Do you know the actual reference off-hand?


7 posted on 07/02/2005 9:32:08 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Wow, some really odd turns of phrase in this article. How about these examples:

"The Gospel of broad and generous inclusion is being undermined by a dangerously monochrome interpretation of scripture."

MONOCHROME? Black and white?

"We are committed to this so that we can try to ensure that the ecclesiology of the Anglican Communion is not subverted."

"Not subverted", of course, means "madatority and positively subverted for sure".

"where genuine debate and searching are replaced by an imposed orthodoxy."

Wait a minute - isn't this a church? Aren't there rules and moral absolutes and a higher authority (God)? So a church is just a bunch of people sitting around debating what is truth and looking for it but never wanting to find it?

Just a sampling.

Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.

Obviously pirates took over this ship, or it was internal mutiny by those who snuck in.





8 posted on 07/02/2005 9:50:06 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonF

Mark 9:43-48


9 posted on 07/03/2005 7:51:51 AM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || <Airbus A380)^: The BIG PIG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RonF

FYI

1 Corinthians 5

Immorality Must Be Judged
9I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people. 10Yet I certainly did not mean with the sexually immoral people of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world. 11But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner--not even to eat with such a person.


10 posted on 07/03/2005 6:08:11 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson