[Ronaldus Magnus]

I find the stubborn part of the pro-life movement that goes for the 100% or nothing to be a detriment to life and to be on the extremest/obsessive side.

There you go again, more mindless pro-abortion propaganda. The straw man position you've been beating up on has nothing to do with real pro-lifers, and you know it. For the sixth time, National Right-To-Life has been willing to accept any limitation on abortion for over thirty years.

I am pro-life

Hardly. If you were than you wouldn't be condemning real pro-lifers for imaginary transgressions in the third party voice. Your false pro-life position is increasingly transparent.

I love God and struggle as much as any guys trying to live by His rules and all

Sure you do...

but I do think I deal with reality far better than the extremist among the pro-life movement.

You really need to do a better job hiding your hatred of the pro-life movement if you want to deceive people over with all your false sympathy.

I share the same goals of the most extreme pro-life person in wanting no death

You mean the ones you just called extremists?

I just don't believe in self-sabotage of progress toward the goal by being obsessed with the all or nothing.

I don't know about that, but you clearly believe in "them-sabotage" with "them" being the pro-life movement.

Things just don't work that way unless you like to get nothing as a result all the time.

From what you've said here, it is clear that your real intent is that pro-lifers get nothing. You are just like the seminar callers on the conservative talk radio shows, and equally ineffective. Using false concern as a vehicle for deceptively destructive advice is a tactic of loosers.

[A CA Guy]

What I hate is getting an extra 750,000 a year dead because of the all or nothing attitude.
What I don't like about the obsessed part of the pro-life movement is the lack of common sense about what we can and can not get through to the voters.

What I want is to first get the 750,000 saved and then to continue with the remaining 2% as we do now the 100%.

It's a cute theological argument you have going, but while you express your piety, some 3/4 of a million a year are dying that need not because we can get most of our platform passed.
But if we have the most obsessed wing of the pro-life movement blocking the saving of all the lives we could save, that is pointless to me.