Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex

I forgot to add something:

I said: But the "superficial ways of appealing to people" was not what got your shorts in a twist. It was you wanting to believe I said that they had in common an immoral lifestyle.

This is easy to prove. A few posts before my reference to Princess Di, I spoke about Billy Graham and the Dali Lama in the same way. You made no comment. It was my mentioning the princess which gave you the wiggle room you needed to jump on something and start twisting it around.


84 posted on 06/25/2005 8:45:51 PM PDT by sempertrad ("Welcome to Knight Burger. What will... ye have?" - MST3K)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: sempertrad; murphE; te lucis

As you wish.

I was irritated by Dalai Lama comparison as well, but Princess Diana went over the top.

There was a similar episode with Te Lucis, where s/he made an obscene reference to the Holy Communion, then claimed being misunderstood. In both cases there was a deliberate escalation of offensive to the Catholic Church but ambiguously worded posts, till someone called you on the offense. It was not my wish then, and it is not my wish now to have anyone banned over this. The only one with a technical violation is me, because I used mild profanity, for which I apologize the the gentle Freepers.

My advice to you all, stop trolling and think of what positive contributions your sect is capable of.


85 posted on 06/25/2005 10:18:48 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson