To: sempertrad; murphE; te lucis
As you wish.
I was irritated by Dalai Lama comparison as well, but Princess Diana went over the top.
There was a similar episode with Te Lucis, where s/he made an obscene reference to the Holy Communion, then claimed being misunderstood. In both cases there was a deliberate escalation of offensive to the Catholic Church but ambiguously worded posts, till someone called you on the offense. It was not my wish then, and it is not my wish now to have anyone banned over this. The only one with a technical violation is me, because I used mild profanity, for which I apologize the the gentle Freepers.
My advice to you all, stop trolling and think of what positive contributions your sect is capable of.
85 posted on
06/25/2005 10:18:48 PM PDT by
annalex
To: annalex; murphE
I was irritated by Dalai Lama comparison as well
Ah, baloney.
Let's see how many instances of "trolling" we can find in this one post of yours alone:
#1.s/he made an obscene reference to the Holy Communion,
False. You took it that way. Its in the past anyway, and only brought up here to show that you now have established a pattern of arrogantly asserting that your way of seeing things means that's how they really are, and if you don't like what you're so sure you're seeing you'll run hog wild with it.
ambiguously worded posts, till someone called you on the offense
If the words are "ambiguous" why not just ask for clarification first before flying off the handle? And if they are "ambiguous" how can you be sure that they are meant the way you see them?
#2. stop trolling
You're the only one trolling. So, stop it.
#3. your sect
Catholicism is no sect. It's the one, true religion.
g'night now.
86 posted on
06/25/2005 10:53:08 PM PDT by
sempertrad
("Welcome to Knight Burger. What will... ye have?" - MST3K)
To: annalex
88 posted on
06/26/2005 8:11:32 PM PDT by
te lucis
("Archbishop Meyers is clearly hiding some very dark secrets." -Fr. Paul Wickens)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson