[sempertrad]

You said in #58 that the late Pope and Lady Diana had similarly superficial ways of appealing to people.

And in addition to being known the world over, and showing compassion and concern for humanity, that's where the similarities end.

But the "superficial ways of appealing to people" was not what got your shorts in a twist. It was you wanting to believe I said that they had in common an immoral lifestyle. You were ticked off for having no substantial argument about ecumenism and were looking for any excuse to go ballistic. So you took a chance and jumped on something. You did something similar to another poster not too long ago.

As far as any apologies you may or may not wish to offer at this time, forget it. I already forgave all your "mild profanities" right after I read them, anyway.

You're welcome.

[sempertrad]

I forgot to add something:

I said: But the "superficial ways of appealing to people" was not what got your shorts in a twist. It was you wanting to believe I said that they had in common an immoral lifestyle.

This is easy to prove. A few posts before my reference to Princess Di, I spoke about Billy Graham and the Dali Lama in the same way. You made no comment. It was my mentioning the princess which gave you the wiggle room you needed to jump on something and start twisting it around.