[annalex]

I was comparing the worldly love for the late pope to the same type of worldly love for the late princess

You said in #58 that the late Pope and Lady Diana had similarly superficial ways of appealing to people. If, now, you are ready to retract your #58, apologize for it, and if you must, explain yourself better, go right ahead, and I will retract and apologize for all the mild profanity I directed your way.

I am not interested in any other opinion you have.

[murphE]

If, now, you are ready to retract your #58, apologize for it, and if you must, explain yourself better, go right ahead, and I will retract and apologize for all the mild profanity I directed your way.

Whoa, deja vu. This is the same thing you did to te lucis on another thread. You misread what someone says, then you behave badly, then you demand an apology from them. If this follows true to form, in a few more posts sempertrad and I will be suspended, and you will be claiming that you never meant that to happen.

[sempertrad]

You said in #58 that the late Pope and Lady Diana had similarly superficial ways of appealing to people.

And in addition to being known the world over, and showing compassion and concern for humanity, that's where the similarities end.

But the "superficial ways of appealing to people" was not what got your shorts in a twist. It was you wanting to believe I said that they had in common an immoral lifestyle. You were ticked off for having no substantial argument about ecumenism and were looking for any excuse to go ballistic. So you took a chance and jumped on something. You did something similar to another poster not too long ago.

As far as any apologies you may or may not wish to offer at this time, forget it. I already forgave all your "mild profanities" right after I read them, anyway.

You're welcome.