No one here has stated that, and you didn't even have to read the whole letter to see to whom it is addressed.
or in need of "reproval", then the gates of hell have prevailed.
So the gates of hell prevailed way back when Paul rebuked Pope Peter I?
Why don't you read the letter instead of attacking things it doesn't say.
I copied another's comment that said..."If the seat of Rome is "vacant"
You responded "...No one here has stated that, and you didn't even have to read the whole letter to see to whom it is addressed." followed by "Why don't you read the letter instead of attacking things it doesn't say."
Good advice. I think you have me confused with the poster that I was responding to. I never stated that I thought that the AUTHOR implied there was no Pope, merely that the Sedevacantists should explain their position. If you are one, please explain how you are different than a Protestant and his private interpretations. If you are not, then don't worry, it wasn't addressed to you.
Regards